首页|IOC1联合IOC2监测在持续植物状态和微小意识状态患者全身麻醉中的应用效果

IOC1联合IOC2监测在持续植物状态和微小意识状态患者全身麻醉中的应用效果

扫码查看
目的 分析脑电意识指数(IOC1)联合伤害敏感指数(IOC2)监测在持续植物状态(PVS)和微小意识状态(MCS)患者全身麻醉中的应用效果.方法 选取2022年3月至2023年9月在该院进行手术的50例PVS或MCS患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将其分为对照组和意识指数监测组,各25例.对照组进行常规监测,意识指数监测组同时监测IOC1和IOC2.记录两组麻醉前(T0)、诱导后(T1)、插管后(T2)、手术开始5 min(T3)、手术结束(T4)平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR).记录两组麻醉期间各时间指标、瑞芬太尼和七氟醚用量及低血压和窦性心动过缓发生率.结果 对照组T1、T2、T3、T4的MAP低于T0,且T3低于T1、T2,T4高于T3,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).意识指数监测组T1、T2、T3、T4的MAP低于T0,且T3、T4的MAP高于T1、T2,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).对照组T1、T2、T3、T4的HR低于T0,且T3低于T1、T2,T4高于T3,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).意识指数监测组T1、T2、T3、T4的HR低于T0,且T4的HR高于T1、T2、T3,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).意识指数监测组拔管时间及麻醉恢复室滞留时间短于对照组,瑞芬太尼和七氟醚用量少于对照组,术中低血压发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 在PVS和MCS患者麻醉中,采用IOC1和IOC2监测可减少麻醉药物用量,稳定血压和HR,准确预判拔管时机并缩短麻醉恢复室滞留时间.
Application effect of IOC1 combined with IOC2 monitoring in patients with persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state during general anesthesia
Objective To analyze the application effect of consciousness index(IOC1)and nociceptive sen-sitivity index(IOC2)monitoring in patients with persistent vegetative state(PVS)the minimally conscious state(MCS)during general anesthesia.Methods Fifty patients with PVS or MCS who underwent surgery in this hospital from March 2022 to September 2023 were randomly divided into the control group and the con-sciousness index monitoring group,25 cases in each group.Routine monitoring was performed in the control group,and IOC1 and IOC2 were monitored in the consciousness index monitoring group at the same time.Mean arterial pressure(MAP)and heart rate(HR)of two groups were collected before anesthesia(T0),after induction(T1),after intubation(T2),5 min after surgery(T3)and at the end of surgery(T4).The time in-dex,dosage of remifentanil and sevoflurane,incidence of hypotension and sinus bradycardia during anesthesia were recorded.Results The MAP of T1,T2,T3,T4 in the control group was lower than that of T0,and the MAP of T3 was lower than that of T1 and T2,and the MAP of T4 was higher than that of T3,and the differ-ences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The MAP of T1,T2,T3 and T4 in the consciousness index mo-nitoring group was lower than that of T0,and the MAP of T3 and T4 was higher than that of T1 and T2,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The HR of T1,T2,T3,T4 in the control group was lower than that of T0,and the HR of T3 was lower than that of T1 and T2,and the HR of T4 was higher than that of T3,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The HR of T1,T2,T3,T4 in the con-sciousness index monitoring group was lower than that of T0,and the HR of T4 was higher than that of T1,T2,T3,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The extubation time and anesthesia recov-ery room retention time in the consciousness index monitoring group were shorter than those in the control group,the dosage of remifentanil and sevoflurane were less than those in the control group,and the incidence of hypotension in the consciousness index monitoring group was lower than that in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion In patients with PVS and MCS,IOC1 and IOC2 monitoring can reduce the dosage of anesthetic drugs,stabilize blood pressure and HR,accurately predict the time of extubation and shorten the retention time of anesthesia recovery room.

deep sedationnociceptive paincritical care outcomegeneral anesthesiaquantitative consciousness index

李响、陈朝阳、程庆、王馨雪、张蓉、赵泽宇

展开 >

成都中医药大学附属四川省康复医院/四川省八一康复中心麻醉科,四川成都 611135

深度镇静 伤害性疼痛 危重症监护结局 全身麻醉 定量意识指数

2025

检验医学与临床
重庆市卫生信息中心 重庆市临床检验中心

检验医学与临床

影响因子:1.096
ISSN:1672-9455
年,卷(期):2025.22(1)