城中村微改造模式比较研究——以深圳为例
A Comparative Study on Micro-Transformation Pattern of Urban Village:Taking Shenzhen City as an Example
翁奕城 1陈梓聪2
作者信息
- 1. 华南理工大学建筑学院;广州市景观建筑重点实验室
- 2. 华南理工大学建筑学院
- 折叠
摘要
当前,城市更新从"大拆大建"转变为"留、改、拆并举"的微改造模式.城中村作为一个多元复杂的地理空间是城市更新的重要地区.目前,关于城中村微改造模式的研究成果颇丰,但不同微改造模式的比较研究则较为薄弱.文章聚焦深圳城中村微改造,以南头古城、水围村以及蒲公英生活垃圾分类体验园为例,从改造主体的特点、各主体的组合方式、运行机制等方面,对政府主导、企业主导以及社区共治三种微改造模式进行比较研究.倡导以多元共治的城中村微改造模式,坚持积极适度的政府主导,推动企业力量协同参与,强化社区居民的主体意识,以期为城中村微改造提供指导,助力城市的更新发展.
Abstract
Now urban renewal has changed from large-scale demolition and construction to micro-transformation mode of retaining,reforming and demolishing at the same time.As a diversified and complex geographical space,urban village is an important area of urban renewal.At present,there are abundant research results on micro-transformation of urban villages,but the comparative study of different micro-transformation models is relatively weak.This paper focuses on the mic-rotransformation mode of urban villages in Shenzhen,taking Nantou Ancient City,Shuiwei Village and Dandelion Garbage Classification Experience Park as examples,and makes a comparative study of three micro-transformation modes,namely government-led,enterprise-led and community co-governance,from the aspects of the characteristics of the transformation subjects,the combination mode of each subject and the operation mechanism.Finally,it advocates the micro-transformation mode of urban villages with multiple co-governance,adheres to the active and moderate government leadership,promotes the collaborative participation of enterprises,and strengthens the subjective consciousness of community residents,in order to provide guidance for the micro-transformation of urban villages and help urban renewal and development.
关键词
微改造模式/城中村/对比研究/多元共治Key words
micro-transformation mode/urban village/comparative studies/pluralism and co-governance引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
万方数据