Research on the High Cognitive Level Driving Path of Postgraduate Research Integrity Based on Qualitative Comparative Analysis(QCA)Method:Taking a Medical College as an Example
With the continuous expansion of the scale and volume of scientific research in China,academic misconduct has also occurred frequently.Therefore,it is necessary for graduate students,the new force of scientific research,to get educated so as to comply with the requirements of research integrity.Enhancing the cognitive level of research integrity is the core of such education,and the factors affecting the cognitive level of graduate students'research integrity are intertwined.This paper conducts literature review and visual analysis,and focuses on two types of key factors,both internal and external to explore the grouping mechanism of improving graduate students'research integrity cognition.During this process,the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis and configuration analysis approach are adopted,based on the questionnaires of 1 950 students in a medical college.The results indicate that a variety of influencing factors combined with educational measures form different paths to improve cognitive level,five paths lead to the improvement of research integrity of postgraduate students in medical colleges,with three different driving force,respectively led by school curriculum education,"dual-core"of the daily requirements of supervisors and the perception of hazards,and policy-awareness.Besides,enhancing the synergistic mechanism construction of education and the internal motivation of research,as well as efficiently utilizing the external motivation of perception are important ways to improve the level of research integrity.Based on this,the paper proposes suggestions from the three aspects of multi-subject synergy,internal and external factors integration,and evaluation and teaching mutual combination,hoping to provide new countermeasures for the innovation of graduate students'research integrity education.
scientific research integrity cognitioncognition levelgraduate educationconfiguration analysisqualitative comparative analysisscientific research integrity education