首页|高质量发展背景下科普展览教育效果评估方法研究及实践探索——以广东科学中心为例

高质量发展背景下科普展览教育效果评估方法研究及实践探索——以广东科学中心为例

扫码查看
科学的科普效果评估,尤其是科普展览的科学教育作用以及展品的实际教育效果评估,是推动加快构建大科普格局、科普高质量发展的有力支撑,但目前相关研究较少.为此,提出一套针对教育效果的科普展览评估体系,以科普展览观众中的探索者、协助者作为主要研究对象,结合行为研究法与对比研究法,将采集到的数据进行相应编码,以观众行为为切入点,深入单个科普展项,探究其对观众在知识层面的影响机制;并以广东科学中心的"食药馆"和"疫苗展"两个展览进行试验,以 6~12 岁的 90 名观展学生作为调查对象,探究观众行为与学习的相关性,进而对展项作出综合评估.该评估体系主要根据观众对展项内容接收程度来判断其相关认知改变,从而综合评估科普展览的教育效果.试验结果显示:观众对以测试考核为主的展项所表达的知识内容接收最好,适当的社交刺激可提高展项的教育效果;部分展项存在娱乐性与教育性失衡的现象,娱乐性较强的互动形式虽能提高展项吸引力、增加观众参与频率,但未必对展项的教育效果起到正向的反馈作用;辅助模型需另寻更恰当的结合方式,且传统的实验展示方式需要进行更新迭代.
Evaluation Framework Research and Practical Exploration on the Learning Impacts of Science Exhibition Under the Background of High-Quality Development:Taking the Guangdong Science Center as an Example
Scientific evaluation of the impacts of science communication,especially the learning impacts of science exhibitions and the actual educational effects of exhibits,is a strong support for accelerating the construction of a large science communication paradigm and the high-quality development of science communication,but there are few relevant studies at present.To this end,a science exhibition framework for evaluating learning impacts is proposed,taking explorers and facilitators in exhibitions as target audience by using the combination of behavioral research methods with comparative research methods.Taking audience behavior as the starting point,this paper conducts an in-depth research on a single exhibit exploring its learning impacts on the audience's knowledge level.This framework has been implemented in two exhibitions,"Guangdong Food and Drug Exploration Hall"and"The Incredible Vaccine",aiming at students aged 6 to 12,to explore the correlation between visitors'behavior and exhibits'learning impacts so as to analyze the root causes of such impacts,thereby improving the educational effect of science exhibitions.The test results indicate that exhibits using the test or competition form rank the first place in receiving positive learning impacts since they produce certain social stimulus for visitors to engage more in the knowledge behind exhibits.There is an imbalance between entertainment and education in several exhibits.Although strong interactive form can attract more visitors,however,they fail to improve visitors'learning.More forms in one exhibit doesn't mean good.The use of multiple exhibit forms,e.g.models with media,should be more careful.Conventional experimental simulation forms should be upgraded since visitors are no longer satisfied with them.

science exhibitionexhibition learningevaluation studieslearning impactsinteractive performancecross-case analysisscience exhibition frameworkscience communication

陈昕、宋婧、吴夏灵、陈宏

展开 >

广东科学中心,广东广州 510006

广东省科技合作研究促进中心,广东广州 510030

科普展览 展项教育 效果评估 互动方式 交叉分析 科普展评估体系 科学普及

2024

科技管理研究
广东省科学学与科技管理研究会

科技管理研究

CSTPCDCHSSCD
影响因子:0.779
ISSN:1000-7695
年,卷(期):2024.44(10)