As a new trend in global science and technology development with important strategic significance,open science advocates freedom,openness,cooperation and sharing in the process of scientific knowledge production,which greatly improves the efficiency and quality of scientific knowledge production.It coincides with the logic of cultivating and developing new quality productive forces and will be the key to nurturing new quality productivity to seize scientific centers and innovation heights.It is also a new arena for countries around the world to compete.China has made great progress in open science in recent years,but we must see the problems and shortcomings that still exist.Therefore,this paper explores the specific role of open science in promoting the formation and development of new quality productive forces and analyzes the open science governance model suitable for China.Through literature research and comparative analysis methods,the paper sorts out and clarifies the important significance of open science in promoting qualitative changes in scientific research paradigms,selects the Horizon 2020 of European Union,the Center for Open Science(COS)of America,and the Open Science Identity(OSID)of China as representative cases,and compares the differences between different open science models in terms of planning policies,skills training,evaluation systems and investment patterns.From the perspective of scientific governance,it is found that the EU's development of open science combines macro-top-level design and micro-evaluation system reform,starting from policy planning,it has built a complete open science development network including skill training,evaluation system,and investment pattern,with prominent characteristics of official-led unity and win-win coordination among countries;COS emphasizes an open pattern of diversified investment and extensive participation,and forms a complete set of open science promotion and practice models with its OSF platform as the core;OSID has tried it first in the form of a national public welfare plan,with good policy support and journal participation,but there are shortcomings such as low layout integrity and poor market flexibility.Based on the comparison of different open science development models in the world,it is proposed that China can build a Chinese-style open science governance system through strengthening scientific and technological planning,cultivating professional talents,improving the evaluation system and optimizing the funding structure,to help the formation of new quality productive forces through scientific and technological innovation.
open sciencescience governance systemnew quality productive forcesevaluation systemscientific developmentforeign experience
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
