首页|高校教师科研评价的理念、方法和程序对教师科研行为的影响——基于制度满意度的视角

高校教师科研评价的理念、方法和程序对教师科研行为的影响——基于制度满意度的视角

扫码查看
提高高校科研竞争能力的关键在于提高大学教师投身于科研创新的意愿并促使其养成积极科研行为的习惯.良好的高校教师科研评价制度是激励教师科研意愿和持续科研行为的助推器,也是提升高校科研竞争力和整体办学实力的压舱石.为此,有必要探索高校科研评价制度与高校教师科研行为之间的关系及作用机制.通过对8所不同类型高校的446名教师进行问卷调查,综合运用多元线性回归、Bootstrap检验等方法分析大学教师科研评价理念、方法和程序对教师科研行为的影响,并检验科研制度满意度在两者之间的中介作用.研究发现:发展性评价理念、质量导向评价方法以及民主性评价程序对大学教师积极性科研行为具有显著正向影响,且科研制度满意度在其中发挥部分中介效应;大学教师科研评价的结果性评价理念、数量导向评价方法以及威权性评价程序对大学教师的消极性科研行为具有显著正向影响,制度满意度在数量导向评价方法、威权性评价程序与大学教师消极性科研行为中发挥了部分中介效应,但在结果性评价理念和消极性科研行为中不存在中介效应.由此建议高校应适时调整科研评价制度,建立发展性评价为主、结果性评价为辅的评价理念,充分关注教师科研成果的质量,并运用民主性评价程序调动教师参与科研评价的积极性.
The Impacts of Ideas,Methods,and Procedures of University Teachers'Scientific Research Evaluation on Teachers'Scientific Research Behavior from the Perspective of Institution Satisfaction
The key to improving the competitiveness of university research is to increase the willingness of university teachers to engage in research and innovation,and to encourage university teachers to develop habits of positive research behavior.A good research evaluation system for university teachers can stimulate teachers'willingness to conduct research and sustainable research behavior,as well as increase the competitiveness of university research and the overall strength of the university.Therefore,it is necessary to explore the relationship and mechanisms between the research evaluation system in universities and the research behavior of universities'teachers.In this study,446 teachers from eight different types of universities are surveyed by questionnaire,and multiple linear regression and bootstrap tests are used to analyze the influence of university teachers'research evaluation concepts,methods,and procedures on teachers'research behavior,and to test the mediating role of satisfaction with the research system in this process.It is found that the developmental evaluation concept,quality-oriented evaluation methods,and democratic evaluation procedures have a significant positive effect on university teachers'positive research behavior,and research system satisfaction plays a partial mediating effect;the outcome-based evaluation concepts,quantity-oriented evaluation methods,and authoritative evaluation procedures of university teachers'research evaluations have a significant positive effect on their negative research behavior,and system satisfaction plays a partial mediating effect in outcome-based evaluation concepts,quantity-oriented evaluation methods,authoritative evaluation procedures,and university teachers'negative research behavior.However,there is no mediating effect in outcome-based evaluation concepts and negative research behavior.Satisfaction with the research system plays a partial mediating effect in quantitative evaluation methods,authoritative evaluation procedures,and negative research behavior of university teachers,but there is no mediating effect in outcome-based evaluation concepts and negative research behavior.Therefore,the study suggests that higher education institutions should establish an evaluation concept that focuses on developmental evaluation and is complemented by outcome-based evaluation.On the other hand,adjust the research evaluation system in due course,and pay more attention to the quality of teachers'scientific research achievements.Also,democratic evaluation procedures should be employed to stimulate teachers'motivation to participate in research evaluation.

university teachersresearch behaviorresearch evaluation systemsystem satisfactionresearch evaluation concepts

宋丰练、高涵、王子成

展开 >

湖南农业大学,湖南长沙 410128

湖南科技大学教育学院,湖南湘潭 411201

高校教师 科研行为 科研评价制度 制度满意度 科研评价理念

湖南省社会科学基金重大项目

23ZDAJ013

2024

科技管理研究
广东省科学学与科技管理研究会

科技管理研究

CSTPCDCHSSCD
影响因子:0.779
ISSN:1000-7695
年,卷(期):2024.44(17)