首页|科技创新平台研究的知识架构与时空向度——基于Web of Science与CiteSpace的文献计量分析

科技创新平台研究的知识架构与时空向度——基于Web of Science与CiteSpace的文献计量分析

扫码查看
科技创新平台是驱动创新的有效载体.与世界主要科技创新强国相比,中国科技创新平台存在资源共享机制不健全、主体间关联性和依存度不足等问题,有必要对已有文献研究经验进行批判性学习.结合经典平台理论研究,运用CiteSpace软件,对1956-2021年国际上有关科技创新平台研究进行系统性回顾,并探析其研究趋势.研究发现:国际上有关科技创新平台的研究经历了资源整合(1956-1981年),到关注资源承载者的多边架构(1982-2007年),再到协调平台多参与者的创新生态(2008 年至今)3 个阶段.由此建议未来研究进一步挖掘科技创新平台中平台一词的含义,识别平台的模块化架构、网络效应以及多层平台的属性;深入开展科技创新平台治理研究,包括基于模块化经典理论、社会学习的视角等探寻平台的构建策略与基于利益相关者理论、元组织视角以及平台生命周期视角探讨平台的生态化发展策略研究;关注面向公众开放的DIY实验室(do-it-yourself laboratories)、数字赋能的开放式创新平台等体现创新民主化的科技创新平台新形式.
Knowledge Architecture and Spatiotemporal Dimension Clairvoyance Research of Scientific and Technological Innovation Platform:Bibliometric Analysis Based on Web of Science and CiteSpace
Scientific and technological(sci-tech)innovation platform is an effective carrier to drive innovation.Compared with major sci-tech innovation powers in the world,there are some problems in the practice of sci-tech innovation platforms in China,such as dispersion of sci-tech resources,insufficient relevance and dependence among subjects.It is necessary to critically study relevant existing literature research.Combined with classical platform theory and using CiteSpace software,this study systematically reviews the research on foreign sci-tech innovation platforms from 1956 to 2021,and explores its research trends.The study finds that the research on relevant scientific research platforms in the country has experienced three stages:resource integration(1956-1981),multilateral framework focusing on resource carriers(1982-2007),and innovation ecology focusing on multi-participant coordination platforms(from 2008 to the present).Therefore,it is suggested that future research should further explore the meaning of platform of sci-tech innovation platform,and identify the modular architecture,network effects and attributes of multi-layer platform;conduct in-depth research on the governance of sci-tech innovation platform including exploring the construction strategy of the platform based on modular classical theory and social learning perspective and exploring the ecological development strategy of the platform based on stakeholder theory,meta-organization perspective and platform life cycle perspective;pay attention to new forms of sci-tech innovation platforms that reflect the democratization of innovation,such as DIY laboratories(do-it-yourself laboratories)open to the public and open innovation platforms enabled by digital technology.

scientific and technological innovation platformsCiteSpaceknowledge basementresearch hotspotsresearch trends

施宇、潘明明、盛亚

展开 >

浙江农林大学经济管理学院,浙江杭州 311300

浙江工商大学工商管理学院(MBA学院),浙江杭州 310018

科技创新平台 CiteSpace 知识基础 研究热点 研究趋势

2024

科技管理研究
广东省科学学与科技管理研究会

科技管理研究

CSTPCDCHSSCD
影响因子:0.779
ISSN:1000-7695
年,卷(期):2024.44(22)