Reflections on Promoting High-quality Evaluation of Humanities and Social Sciences Journals by Academic Community
The high-quality development of humanities and social sciences journals relies on effective e-valuation mechanisms.Over the years,China's humanities and social sciences journals have established rela-tively mature evaluation frameworks.However,practical implementation of these frameworks has disclosed sev-eral problems,including the failure to adequately account for the unique characteristics and disparities among these journals and their respective disciplines,insufficient assessment of content quality and innovation,and in-adequate recognition of the primary role of the academic community in evaluation.In response to the imperative of advancing top-tier academic journal development,it is essential to prioritize the cultivation and integration of the academic community in journal evaluation processes.This entails fostering synergy between academic communities and journals,catalyzing the aggregation of expert insights,and positioning the academic community as a central stakeholder in humanities and social sciences journal evaluation.This necessitates clarifying the trajectory,functional roles,and responsibilities of the academic community,hence refining the multifaceted e-valuation system for humanities and social sciences academic journals and fostering the high-quality develop-ment of academic journals in China.
academic communityhumanities and social sciences journalshigh-quality evaluationjour-nal evaluationmultiple stakeholders
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
