首页|5种流体树脂与牙釉质粘接性能的对比研究

5种流体树脂与牙釉质粘接性能的对比研究

扫码查看
目的 通过比较 Beautifil Flow Plus F00、FiltekTM Z350 XT、SDR、Tetric® N-Flows、Constic 5 种流体树脂与牙釉质的粘接性能,为流体树脂的临床选择提供参考.方法 选择因正畸拔除的成人离体前磨牙50颗,将离体牙随机分为5组(n=10),分别为F00组、Z350组、SDR组、Tetric组、Constic组,每组之间互为平行对照组.每颗离体牙颊侧中1/3磨除厚度为0.5 mm牙釉质,以直径为3 mm的圆形形态作为粘接面,每种树脂制作直径和长度均为3 mm圆柱形树脂试件10个,与预备好的牙釉质面进行粘接,自凝树脂进行包埋.将试件进行3 000次冷热循环交替实验和37℃恒温水浴24 h实验后,进行剪切强度测试,记录数据;切断的粘接界面在扫描电镜下观察.结果 F00组的剪切强度为(18.39±2.93)MPa、Z350组的剪切强度(11.03 ±1.55)MPa、SDR 组的剪切强度为(12.77±1.55)MPa、Tetric 组的剪切强度为(15.25±1.88)MPa、Constic 组的剪切强度为(12.79 ±2.78)MPa,对所得数据进行ANOVA检验和SNK检验后得出,F00组的剪切强度显著高于其他4组(Z350组、SDR组、Tetric组、Constic 组)(P<0.05);Tetric 组的剪切强度显著高于其余 3 组(Z350 组、SDR 组、Constic 组)(P<0.05);Z350 组、SDR 组、Constic组3组之间的剪切强度没有显著性差异(P>0.05).结论 5种流体树脂中Beautifil Flow Plus F00流体树脂粘接性能最高,Tetric® N-Flow流体树脂次之,FiltekTM Z350 XT、SDR、Constic这3种流体树脂粘接性能较低.
Comparative study on the bonding properties of five kinds of fluid resins to enamel
Objective To provide reference for clinical selection of fluid resins by comparing the bonding properties of Beautifil Flow Plus F00,FiltekTM Z350 XT,SDR,Tetric® N-Flows and Constic with tooth enamel.Methods Fifty adult extrinsic premolars were se-lected for orthodontic extraction and randomly divided into five groups(n=10),namely F00 group,Z350 group,SDR group,Tetric group and Constic group,and each group was a parallel control group.One third of the cheek of each isolated tooth was removed by grinding the enamel with the thickness of 0.5 mm,and a circular shape with a diameter of 3 mm was used as the bonding surface.Ten cylindrical resin specimens with a diameter and length of 3 mm were prepared for bonding with the prepared tooth enamel surface,and self-coagulation resin was embedded.After 3 000 times of alternating cold and hot cycles and 24 h of constant temperature water bath at 37 ℃,the shear strength test was carried out;the data were recorded,and the cut bonding interface was observed under scanning elec-tron microscope.Results The shear strength of group F00 was(18.39±2.93)MPa,and that of group Z350 was(11.03±1.55)MPa.The shear strength of,SDR group was(12.77±1.55)MPa;Tetric group was(15.25±1.88)MPa and Constic group was(12.79±2.78)MPa.ANOVA test and SNK test were performed on the obtained data.The shear strength of F00 group was significantly higher than that of Z350 group,SDR group,Tetric group and Constic group(P<0.05).The shear strength of Tetric group was significantly higher than that of Z350 group,SDR group and Constic group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in shear strength among Z350 group,SDR group and Constic group(P>0.05).Conclusion Among the five fluid resins,Beautifil Flow Plus F00 fluid resin has the highest bonding performance,followed by Tetric® N-Flow fluid resin,and FiltekTM Z350 XT,SDR and Constic fluid resin have low bonding performance.

fluid resinshear strengthbonding properties

郭欣欣、苗振云、荆雪、马思雨、李涛

展开 >

河北医科大学口腔医院口腔预防科,河北省口腔医学重点实验室河北省口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,河北石家庄(050017)

西北工业大学化学与化工学院,陕西西安(710000)

流体树脂 剪切强度 粘接性能

河北省省级科技计划

21377717D

2024

口腔医学
南京医科大学口腔医学院

口腔医学

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.641
ISSN:1003-9872
年,卷(期):2024.44(3)
  • 1
  • 24