首页|5种口内扫描仪在口腔种植机器人中配准精度体外对比研究

5种口内扫描仪在口腔种植机器人中配准精度体外对比研究

扫码查看
目的:评估口腔种植机器人使用5种口内扫描仪进行口扫配准的准确性.方法:分别使用口扫配准法和锥形束计算机断层扫描(cone beam computed tomography,CBCT)配准法完成机器人辅助种植手术的配准过程,其中口扫配准法采用5种不同的口内扫描仪,然后在机器人引导下于下颌牙列缺损模型中植入2枚种植体.术后拍摄CBCT进行偏差分析,主要分析指标为种植体角度偏差、植入点和根尖点的总偏差.结果:5种不同口内扫描仪下的机器人的口扫配准精度在种植体角度偏差、植入点深度和横向偏差、根尖点深度和横向偏差均不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);在植入点总偏差、根尖点总偏差具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:口腔种植机器人使用5种口内扫描仪进行口扫配准的精度均可以达到良好的临床效果,但不同口内扫描仪的配准精度有差异.
Comparative Accuracy of Registration of Five Intraoral Scanners in Dental Implant Robot in Vitro
Objective:To evaluate the accuracy of registration of oral implant robot using five kinds of intraoral scanners.Methods:The registration process of robot-assisted implant surgery was completed by using the oral scanning registration method and the cone beam computed tomography(CBCT)registration method,respectively.The oral scanning registration method used five different intraoral scanners,and then two implants were implanted in the mandibular dentition defect model under the guidance of the robot.CBCT was taken after operation for deviation analysis.The main analysis indexes were implant angle deviation and total deviation of implantation point and apical point.Results:The registration accuracy of the robot under five different intraoral scanners was not statistically significant in implant angular deviation,implant depth and level deviation,and apical depth and level deviation(P>0.05).The total deviation of the entry point and the total deviation of the apical point were statisti-cally significant(P<)0.05.Conclusion:The accuracy of oral implant robot registration using five kinds of intraoral scanners can achieve good clinical results,but the registration accuracy of different intraoral scanners is different.

robot-guided surgeryaccuracyregistrationintraoral scannerdental implant

赵文博、苏航、滕微微、李昕茹、王一茗、周立波

展开 >

佳木斯大学附属口腔医院,黑龙江省口腔生物医学材料及临床应用重点实验室 黑龙江 佳木斯 154000

机器人辅助手术 精度 口内扫描仪 配准 口腔种植

2024

口腔医学研究
武汉大学口腔医学院

口腔医学研究

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.48
ISSN:1671-7651
年,卷(期):2024.40(12)