量子力学的逆向因果争论及其辨析
On the Debates and Analysis of Backward Causation in Quantum Mechanics
孙圣1
作者信息
- 1. 西北师范大学哲学与社会学院,兰州 730070
- 折叠
摘要
逆向因果常见于承诺时间反演对称性的量子力学哲学解释中,刘易斯使用过度决定论对逆向因果进行哲学审视,这在逆向因果现阶段的主要科学哲学争论中占据重要位置.研究发现,对因果关系中的事件做精细个化的思想实验不是任意的,需要在物理律则允许的范围内进行.沿用普赖斯的进路,以汉弗莱斯的熔合突现论为例,研究说明了直觉何以在批评逆向因果问题上存在不充分性,一定程度的回应了刘易斯对逆向因果的指责.
Abstract
Backward causation normally presents in philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics committing time reversal symmetric characteristics,on which is philosophically reviewed by Lewis from a perspective of overde-termination.It holds key position in the major scientific philosophical debates of backward causation at this stage.Study shows that thought experiments operating on fine-grained individuation of events in causation are not arbi-trary,that is,they appropriately yield to physical laws.According to Price's approach,this paper is citing fusion emergence of Humphreys as typical of the inadequacy of criticism of backward causation,which responses to Lew-is'opposition to backward causation to some extent.
关键词
逆向因果作用/科学思想实验/量子力学的哲学解释/时间反演非对称性/熔合突现论Key words
backward causation/thought experiments in science/philosophical interpretations of quantum mechan-ics/time reversal asymmetry/fusion emergence引用本文复制引用
基金项目
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(22YJC720015)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据