首页|人工智能时代的技术授权与道德责任

人工智能时代的技术授权与道德责任

扫码查看
在人工智能时代,技术授权可以在暂时搁置人工代理资格的情况下集中讨论人工智能代替人类行事、接受人类委托任务的问题.人工智能仅能代替人类完成整个行为计划的一部分,而非行为本身.随着人工智能的发展,技术授权的范围由单态行为逐渐扩展成行为群,未来可能扩展至整个行为坐标系,此时,人工智能体就成为了完全的人工代理.经由技术授权,人类与人工智能形成了特殊的人机交互关系,带来了远距离、匿名性等问题并创造出新的行为层面,进而对道德产生了重要而复杂的影响.既然道德上的善恶产生于人机联合实践之中,相应的道德责任也应归属于人机联合的责任体.行为责任和角色责任相结合可以将人机联合责任继续分配给不同的行为者个体.
Technological delegation and moral responsibility in the era of Artificial Intelligence
With the development of artificial intelligence technology,it has become an objective fact that the computer software acts on behalf of humans or accepts entrusted tasks from humans.However,it is still too early to believe that artificial intelligence has become a reliable agent for human.Artificial intelligence meets some of the characteristics as an agent indeed,but it is still the programmable machine in nature.It has neither inherent intention nor obligation to pursue the interests and goals of the human on its own initiative.There will be many technical and moral risks in the development and application of artificial intelligence.And it is necessary for human to evaluate the risks and benefits involved carefully.Therefore,compared with the term of agency,the term of technological delegation can accurately describe the special human-machine relationships formed by artificial intelligence acting on behalf of humans.According to Collins,most of human actions are the polymorphic actions which are the behavioral coordinate systems composed of conscious and unconscious behaviors.In these behaviors,some,also known as the mimeomorphic actions,can be stylized,formalized,programmed into the computer language.Thus,they can be continuously replicated and accurately reproduced by the machines.At present,most computer softwares can be delegated to carry out the mimeomorphic actions.And some of them can be delegated to carry out several different mimeomorphic actions simultaneously through multiple rounds of negotiation and dialogue with human actors and other software.As several mimeomorphic actions are combined into a behavior group,the scope of delegation for artificial intelligence is also gradually expanding.It can be seen that artificial intelligence can only delegate to carry out a part of the entire behavioral plan for human,rather than the behavioral plan itself.This also determines the scope and limitation of technological delegation.Through the technological delegation,humans and artificial intelligence have formed the special human-machine joint actors,which have had important and complex impacts on morality.Firstly,technological delegation will produce long-distance actions.The initial actors are unable to experience the consequences of their actions directly and may attempt to deny those moral responsibility.Secondly,technological delegation also brings about the anonymity problems.The problems of anonymity will pose a challenge to the attribution of moral responsibility.Thirdly,technological delegation to artificial intelligence will also facilitate the emergence of virtual activities,thus leading to the virtual ethical issues.Finally,the revocability and substitutability of technological delegation will weaken the position of artificial intelligence in ethical practices.The moral responsibility for technological delegation will be attributed to the in-itial actors for their improper or excessive delegation.For the reasons mentioned above,a responsibility gap where no one is responsible will emerge.In the process of the technological delegation,since moral good and evil come from the practices of human-machine cooperation,the corresponding moral responsibility should also attribute to the human-machine joint responsible entity.The joint responsibility can attribute the aggregation effects with moral significance to the human-machine joint actors.But the problem is that it will become an excuse for everyone to deny his own responsibility in language games.Therefore,it is necessary to allocate human-machine joint re-sponsibility by combining the theories of action responsibility and social role responsibility.Action responsibility can divide the joint re-sponsibility into the individual responsibility that belongs to every(quasi)actors,based on the degree of participation of different(quasi)actors in delegating practices and their contributions to the final outcomes.And the social role responsibility requires the(qua-si)actors to actively create their own social roles in delegating practices and in the process of interacting with other(quasi)actors,by taking positive responsibility for the consequences of their actions.

technological delegationmoral responsibilityjoint responsibilityaction responsibilitysocial role responsibility

曲蓉

展开 >

南京信息工程大学马克思主义学院,江苏南京 210044

技术授权 道德责任 联合责任 行为责任 角色责任

2025

科学学研究
中国科学学与科技政策研究会

科学学研究

北大核心
影响因子:2.09
ISSN:1003-2053
年,卷(期):2025.43(1)