首页|风险、原则与责任:基于实验路径的人工智能社会实验伦理规范体系建构探究

风险、原则与责任:基于实验路径的人工智能社会实验伦理规范体系建构探究

扫码查看
人工智能社会实验以社会实验的科学方式观测人工智能技术的综合社会影响,意在对其风险进行前瞻性评估,提前寻求应对策略,促进智能技术的良性发展.人工智能社会实验无疑会对实验场域中的参与人员和社会环境造成深刻的伦理影响,因而亟需建构一套切合实际、行之有效的伦理规范体系.当前研究虽有对于伦理风险和伦理原则的探讨,但仍缺乏有关如何在具体实践中定位伦理风险、落实伦理原则并确定伦理责任的精确阐释.人工智能社会实验的实验路径为其伦理规范体系的确立提供了基本框架.基于实验开展的7个阶段,结合人工智能伦理和社会实验伦理的研究成果:(1)分析整合实验各阶段面临的伦理风险,结合应用场景与技术特征进行深化;(2)梳理提炼普适的伦理原则,将其规范要求细化至实验各个阶段;(3)针对实验开展需要,确定不同参与主体在各阶段的职能作用,据此落实主体间的伦理责任.由此形成对人工智能社会实验伦理研究的基本认识,建构起既表达普遍价值共识,又具备实践可操作性的人工智能社会实验伦理规范体系.
Risks,Principles and Responsibilities:Research on the Construction of the Ethical Norm Framework of Artificial Intelligence Social Experiment Based on the Experimental Path
The Artificial Intelligence Social Experiment(AISE)investigates the broader social impact of AI technolo-gy.It employs social experimentation as a scientific method of research,with the goal of anticipating AI hazards,seeking solutions in advance,and promoting the benign growth of AI technology.AISEs must be carried out in real-life social cir-cumstances and will surely have deep ethical consequences for both the participants and the social environment within the experimental areas.As a result,there is a pressing need to build a practical and effective ethical norm framework.Al-though some studies have investigated relevant ethical risks and principles,scholars and practitioners remain perplexed and divided about how to make these abstract concepts empirically understandable and useful,that is,to"translate"them into practices to guide the actual conduct of AISE.Meanwhile,the unpredictability of AI technology makes it more diffi-cult to forecast and prevent ethical problems,as well as to assign responsibility in AISEs.In this setting,a more detailed explanation of how to identify ethical risks,apply ethical principles,and define ethical obligations in practice is required.Fortunately,the systermatic settings of AISE equip researchers with the tools and approaches to tackle these difficult topics.By sorting out the basic protocol of a standard AISE,it can be summarized that the typical AISE process consists of seven stages:build experimental scenarios,clarify experimental methods,confirm experimental objects,set observed variables,organize experimental implementation,analyze experimental data,and provide feedback on experimental results.Based on the specific stages of experiments,the ethical risks,principles,and responsibilities may be appropriately as-sessed and integrated,resulting in the construction of an AISE ethical norm system that can not only convey the value con-sensus in general,but also have strong practical operability.With this approach,the study of ethical risks may be merged based on the risks of AI technology and social experi-mentation at each experimental stage,which awaits enrichment and further interpretation based on diverse application sce-narios paired with various AI features.Following the identification of ethical risks,the ethical principles established along the experimental path can directly target the ethical risks inside each stage,maximizing normative efficacy.By organizing the most prevalent ethical principles in AI ethics and social experiment ethics,the overlapping chosen principles of benefi-cence、autonomy、non-maleficence、justice and transparency are shown.Each principle informs different normative criteria and exerts varied normative effects at different phases,such comprehensive refinement works as detailed operating direc-tion for all AISE participants.Furthermore,according to AISE regulations,the key participants in this event can be classi-fied as application subjects,research subjects,technical subjects,and review subjects.Each participant has their own dis-tinct tasks to contribute,which maintains their allocated obligation as well as accountability towards specific elements of the experiments.In this way,a complete comprehension of AISE's ethical norm framework can be acquired and illuminated.The ethi-cal norm system based on the experimental path is not only simple to grasp and reflect the ethical qualities of AISE,but it is also simple to use,which aids in the resolution of practical ethical concerns,the avoidance of ethical harms,the applica-tion of ethical principles,and the definition of ethical obligations.

artificial intelligence social experimentexperimental pathethical risksethical principlesethical respon-sibility

汝鹏、秦晓阳、苏竣

展开 >

清华大学公共管理学院,北京 100084

清华大学智库中心,北京 100084

人工智能社会实验 实验路径 伦理风险 伦理原则 伦理责任

国家自然科学基金面上项目科技部科技创新2030重大项目中国博士后科学基金面上项目

720741342020AAA01054052023M732011

2024

科学学与科学技术管理
中国科学学与科技政策研究会 天津市科学学研究所

科学学与科学技术管理

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.68
ISSN:1002-0241
年,卷(期):2024.45(4)
  • 54