首页|新时期地方争创高水平实验室路径转换与高质量发展策略研究

新时期地方争创高水平实验室路径转换与高质量发展策略研究

扫码查看
省(直辖市、自治区)实验室等高水平实验室是地方争创国家科技战略力量的重大探索.作为培育国家实验室"预备队"的生力军,部分成效显著的高水平实验室成为首批挂牌国家实验室的承载单位.在首批国家实验室已挂牌十多家、高水平实验室超百家的情境下,如何在新时期进行路径转换实现提质增效是全国各地高水平实验室面临的战略性问题.基于此背景,以高水平实验室为研究对象,梳理国家"自上而下"探索建设试点国家实验室、地方"自下而上"争创国家实验室"预备队"、"上下联动"组建首批国家实验室的发展历程,归纳高水平实验室建设中体制机制等方面的实践、创新及问题,并提出其在新时期建的策略:一是明确战略定位,形成战略→战术→产业导向型的"金字塔结构"高水平实验室梯次发展体系;二是建立权责清晰、财力协调的科学治理模式;三是加强实体建设,落实相对独立的科研实体地位,强化自主创新能力;四是从制度、基建、协同等维度,优化创新体系.
Research on the Transformation Path and High-quality Development Strategy of Local High-level Laboratories in the New Era
Optimizing the national innovation system in line with national strategic needs,as well as accelerating the construction of strategic scientific and technological forces under the leadership of national laboratories were emphasized in the 14th National Five-Year Plan.Furthermore,the Party's 20th National Congress also stressed reinforcement of na-tional strategic scientific and technological forces,optimization of the positioning and layout of national research institu-tions,and establishment of a national laboratory system.Against the historical backdrop of the greatest changes the world has seen in a century,the international landscape is being reshaped at an accelerated pace,and global science and technolo-gy are undergoing a revolutionary transformation.The national strategic scientific and technological forces are being the foundation of national scientific and technological high-level self-reliance and self-improvement.The construction of high-level laboratories(i.e.provinces,municipalities,autonomous regions laboratories),orga-nized in a"bottom-up"way,which is an innovative initiative of the local government to create a source of innovation aiming to meet the major national strategic goals and local high-quality development needs,At present,the number of high-level laboratories has grown rapidly and reached a stage of scale development.,a few of them had become the hosting units for national laboratories entering the top echelon of research and development of the national innovation sys-tem,while the others are confronting increasingly fierce disorderly competition since the lack of uniform deployment at national level.At the moment,a majority of high-level laboratories are in the critical transition phase from the construc-tion phase to the growth phase.Here,we propose an important theoretical support for the high-quality construction of high-level laboratories,and then to provide constructive insights for redirecting their development orientation or shifting their strategic focus,avoiding duplication of construction and functional positioning generalization.To address these gaps,the central government's"top-down"exploration of the cultivation of pilot national laborato-ries,the local government's"bottom-up"attempt to nurture candidates for national laboratory,"up-and-down"integrated es-tablishment of the first batch of national laboratories,is comprehensive reviewed by merging multiple methods,including field research,written survey,network analysis and bibliography.Notably,innovative practices and successful experiences of advanced typical high-level laboratories that started early and achieved favorable performance were discussed,common problems and outstanding issues were systematically analyzed through cases repeated comparison and further analysis.It is noted that some high-level laboratories have made significant progress through innovative measures.First,to pro-mote the reform of the system and mechanism,as well as the governance mode of science and technology.Second,to build large-scale research infrastructure,and to explore the frontiers of science and technology.Third,to attract innovative resources by combining toughness with softness,declaring its openness to cooperation with research institutions and universities.Fourth,to promote the combination of research and industry to accelerate the incubation of scientific research achievement.However,our studies show that factors that hinder the development of high-level laboratories include both internal operation and external environment factors.(1)the local governments have rushed into the construction of high-level laboratories without detailed consideration,resulting in repetition of layout and blind construction that costs a huge amount of investment,and(2)there is a shortage of innovative talent,especially among full-time researchers,and need for adaptation of workforce structure,(3)there's a mismatch between the innovation policies of the high-level labora-tories and the current S&T system and procedures,and a lack of clarity or certainty about the rights and responsibilities between the provincial and local governments,(4)lack of independent innovative achievements,owing to insufficient orga-nizational independence and autonomy.Finally,high-quality development ideas and implementation pathways for high level laboratories are proposed.(1)the local government should further clarify the strategic positioning of the laboratory itself by forming a"pyramid structure"trapezoidal structure,namely strategic→tactical→industrial-oriented laboratory system.(2)It is necessary to clarify the rights and responsibilities of the provincial government and local government in the construction and operation,and the al-location of S&T budget reasonably.(3)It proposed to strengthen the unit construction to form an independent research force and strive to cultivate a strong and independent R&D prowess.(4)Through the optimization of the innovation sys-tem,including stable system and mechanism,solid infrastructure,in-depth integration of science and education,promotion of the transformation of scientific research achievements,participation in open innovation,to strengthen scientific and technological core competence and competitive advantage.

provincial laboratoryhigh-level laboratorynational laboratorypath conversionstrategy suggestion

张乐、张军

展开 >

广东省科技图书馆(广东省科学院信息研究所),广州 510070

省实验室 高水平实验室 国家实验室 路径转换 策略研究

广东省省级科技计划广州市哲学社会科学规划项目(2022)

2021B10100100042022GZQN20

2024

科学学与科学技术管理
中国科学学与科技政策研究会 天津市科学学研究所

科学学与科学技术管理

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.68
ISSN:1002-0241
年,卷(期):2024.45(5)
  • 42