首页|绿色创新合作的技术分布、主要模式及网络演化研究——以294个地级市以上城市能源领域为例

绿色创新合作的技术分布、主要模式及网络演化研究——以294个地级市以上城市能源领域为例

扫码查看
基于专利数据,构建时间跨度37年、涵盖294个地级市以上城市的能源绿色创新合作数据库,利用二维象限分析框架和社会网络分析法研究创新合作.研究发现:能源绿色创新合作增长迅速,合作的主要技术领域已经从替代能源生产类为主转向能源节约类为主,技术领域分布越来越广,但仍集中在少数IPC小类中,且这些小类在不同阶段一直在变化;跨组织合作中,企—企合作与企—研合作是最主要的两种合作模式,企—企合作逐渐取代了企—研合作成为主导型创新合作模式;区域合作中,城市绿色创新合作强度与其创新合作强度高度相关,跨城合作大于同城合作;跨城合作网络规模和密度增加迅速,结构洞数值减小,网络节点的平均控制力下降,三种中心性的数值呈现差异化变化;城市在网络中的位置和地位差异较大,据此划分了三类城市.
Research on Technology Distribution,Main Patterns and Network Evolution of Green Innovation Collaboration:Based on the Energy Field of 294 Cities Above the Prefecture Level
Energy green innovation(EGI)has become a key path to achieving carbon peaking,carbon neutrality,and sustainable development.Under policy constraints,collaboration has become an important means to reduce the risks and complexities of green innovation.In this context,based on patent data,an energy green innovation collaboration(EGIC)da-tabase spanning 37 years and covering 294 cities above the prefecture level was constructed.The two-dimensional quadrant analysis framework and social network analysis were used to study the distribution of technology fields,inter-organizational collaboration patterns and characteristics of collaboration networks.The study found that:(1)Alternative energy production(AEP)has always accounted for the highest proportion in the technical field of EGI,but the proportion of energy conserva-tion(EC)has been growing,and the gap with alternative EC has narrowed;the growth of EGIC is rapid,and the main techni-cal fields of collaboration have undergone fundamental changes,from AEP to EC.The technical fields of EGIC in represen-tative cities are becoming more and more widespread,but they are still concentrated in a few IPC subclass of technologies,and these IPC subclasses have been changing at different times.(2)In inter-organizational collaboration,enterprise-enter-prise collaboration(EE)and academic institution-enterprise collaboration(AE)are the two most important collaboration pat-terns.EE has gradually replaced AE as the dominant innovation collaboration pattern;in regional collaboration,most cities are in the'low innovation collaboration intensity/low EGIC intensity'quadrant in the first and second stages.In the third stage,the distribution of cities starts from the coordinate origin and presents a"trumpet-shaped"distribution.During the ob-servation period,many cities achieved the quadrant jump,the relevant analysis results show that the intensity of urban EGCI is highly related to its innovation cooperation intensity,and inter-city collaboration is greater than intra-city collaboration.(3)The scale and density of inter-city cooperative networks increase rapidly,the value of structural holes decreases signifi-cantly,the average control power of nodes decreases,and the values of the three centralities show differentiated changes.The position and status of cities in the network are quite different.Three categories of cities are divided based on the posi-tion and status in networks.The first category is mostly municipalities,sub-provincial cities or strong provincial capital cit-ies with rich structural holes,many connections with other cities,and occupies an important position in the network.The sec-ond category is mostly provincial capital cities with relatively weak economies in the central and western regions or impor-tant cities within the province.These cities are often important bridges between prefecture-level cities in the province and other cities.The third category is general prefecture-level cities,which have certain collaboration with other cities,but occu-py limited resources in the network.

green innovationenergyinter-city collaborationinter-organization collaborationcollaboration network

谢其军、苏竣、汝鹏、许苑

展开 >

清华大学 公共管理学院,北京 100084

教育部科技委战略研究基地清华大学科教政策研究中心,北京 100084

广东电网有限责任公司广州供电局,广州 510620

绿色创新 能源 跨城市合作 跨组织合作 合作网络

2024

科学学与科学技术管理
中国科学学与科技政策研究会 天津市科学学研究所

科学学与科学技术管理

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.68
ISSN:1002-0241
年,卷(期):2024.45(12)