首页|ICU气管插管患者拔管后吞咽障碍康复干预的证据审查与障碍因素分析

ICU气管插管患者拔管后吞咽障碍康复干预的证据审查与障碍因素分析

扫码查看
目的 了解加强监护病房(ICU)气管插管患者拔管后吞咽障碍康复干预证据的临床应用现状,使用鱼骨图分析法中的4M1E因素分析法分析循证实践中的障碍因素、促进因素,制定变革策略,为证据的临床转化提供依据。方法 以基于证据的持续质量改进模式为理论指导,检索、评价,及汇总证据,制定审查指标。采用便利抽样法,以2023年6-7月甘肃省兰州市某三甲医院ICU符合纳入、排除标准的拔管后吞咽障碍患者20例和ICU医护人员30名为研究对象。根据基线审查结果分析障碍因素及促进因素并制定变革策略。结果 共制定35条审查指标。基线审查结果显示,仅8条审查指标执行率超过60%,11条审查指标执行率为0。障碍因素主要包括科室广、人员多、难度大、科室培训内容尚无拔管后吞咽障碍相关内容,以及医护人员高强度工作等。促进因素主要包括科室学习氛围浓厚、实践科室具备示教及电子投影仪等培训设备等。变革策略主要包括组建多学科团队及制定拔管后吞咽障碍课程培训计划等。结论 ICU气管插管患者拔管后吞咽障碍证据与临床实践尚存在较大差距,科学、全面地评估实践中的障碍因素与促进因素,并制定相应的变革策略,可以有效促进证据向临床实践转化。
Evidence review and analysis of barriers to post-extubation dysphagia rehabilitation interventions for tracheally intubated patients in ICU
Objective To understand the current state of evidence-based clinical application of rehabilitation interventions for post-extubation dysphagia in tracheally intubated patients in the intensive care unit(ICU),to analyze the barriers and facilitators of evidence-based practice using the 4M1E Factor Analysis of the Cause&Effect/Fishbone Diagram,and to explore change strategies to inform the clinical translation of evidence.Methods Using the evidence-based continuous quality improvement model as a theoretical guide,evidence was retrieved,evaluated and summarized,and review indicators were developed.A convenience sampling method was used to select 20 patients with post-extubation dysphagia and all 30 ICU healthcare workers as study subjects who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria in the ICU of a tertiary hospital in Lanzhou,Gansu Province,from June to July 2023.Barriers and facilitators were analyzed and change strategies were devel-oped based on the results of the baseline review.Results A total of 35 review indicators were developed.The results of the baseline review showed that only 8 had an implementation rate of more than 60%and 11 had rate of 0.Barriers mainly included a wide range of departments,large number of staff,and two difficulties,that is,the department's current training content did not yet include content related to post-extraction dyspha-gia,and the healthcare staff were faced with a high intensity of work.Facilitating factors included a strong learning atmosphere in the practice unit,and the availability of training equipment such as a demonstration room and an electronic projector in the practice unit.Strategies for change included the formation of a multi-disciplinary team and the development of a post-extraction dysphagia training program.Conclusion There is still a large gap between the evidence of postextubation dysphagia in patients with tracheal intubation in the ICU and that of clinical practice;scientific and comprehensive assessment of barriers and facilitators in prac-tice and development of appropriate strategies for change can effectively facilitate the translation of evidence into clinical practice.

tracheal intubationextubationdysphagiaevidence-based medicinereview indicatorbarrier analysis

陶蕾、王恒阳、孙珊珊、王倩、李文瑞、王瑞、张志刚

展开 >

兰州大学 护理学院,甘肃 兰州 730000

兰州大学第一医院 重症医学科,甘肃 兰州 730000

西安交通大学 医学部护理系,陕西 西安 710000

气管插管 拔管 吞咽障碍 循证医学 审查指标 障碍因素分析

2024

兰州大学学报(医学版)
兰州大学

兰州大学学报(医学版)

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.641
ISSN:1000-2812
年,卷(期):2024.50(8)