首页|剪切波弹性成像联合常规超声预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的临床价值

剪切波弹性成像联合常规超声预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的临床价值

Clinical value of shear wave elastography combined with conventional ultrasound in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer

扫码查看
目的 基于二维剪切波弹性成像(2D-SWE)和常规超声参数构建联合诊断模型,探讨其预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的临床应用价值.方法 选取我院经病理证实的乳腺癌患者285例,以7∶3的比例将其随机分为建模集199例(腋窝淋巴结转移者85例,非转移者114例)和验证集86例(腋窝淋巴结转移者43例,非转移者43例).比较建模集中腋窝淋巴结转移者与非转移者常规超声和2D-SWE参数的差异,包括肿瘤位置、最大径、形态、边缘、回声、钙化、杨氏模量平均值和淋巴结门结构、皮质回声、纵径、横径、皮质与髓质面积比值(LCMR),以及肿瘤和淋巴结收缩期峰值流速(PSV)、舒张末期流速(EDV)、PSV与EDV比值(S/D)、阻力指数(RI)、搏动指数(PI).采用二元Logistic回归分析筛选预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的独立影响因素,并基于上述因素分别构建常规超声模型、2D-SWE模型及联合诊断模型;绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、校准曲线、决策曲线分别评估各模型预测建模集和验证集中乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的诊断效能、校准度及临床适用性,并对各模型间结果进行比较.结果 建模集中腋窝淋巴结转移者与非转移者肿瘤最大径、PSV、RI、杨氏模量平均值及淋巴结门结构、皮质回声、LCMR、PSV、S/D比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).二元Logistic回归分析显示,肿瘤最大径、肿瘤杨氏模量平均值、淋巴结PSV及LCMR均为预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的独立影响因素(均P<0.05).ROC曲线分析显示,2D-SWE模型、常规超声模型及联合诊断模型预测建模集和验证集中乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的曲线下面积分别为0.75、0.77、0.91和0.73、0.77、0.90,联合诊断模型的曲线下面积高于其余2个模型,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).校准曲线显示,联合诊断模型预测建模集和验证集中乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的校准曲线与理想曲线贴合,而2D-SWE模型和常规超声模型的校准曲线均偏离理想曲线;与2D-SWE模型和常规超声模型比较,联合诊断模型的H-L值更高,Brier评分更低,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).决策曲线显示,联合诊断模型预测建模集和验证集中乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的临床净获益更高,建模集和验证集的净重新分类指数和综合判别改善指数分别为15.18%、12.36%和17.14%、14.20%,高于同一数据集中的2D-SWE模型和常规超声模型,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).结论 基于2D-SWE和常规超声参数构建的联合诊断模型显著提高了预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的准确性,具有较好的临床应用价值.
Objective To construct a combined diagnostic model based on two-dimensional shear wave elastography(2D-SWE)and conventional ultrasound parameters,and to explore its clinical application value in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.Methods A total of 285 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer from our hospital were selected and divided into a modeling set(199 cases,with 85 cases of axillary lymph node metastasis and 114 non-metastatic cases)and a validation set(86 cases,with 43 cases of axillary lymph node metastasis and 43 non-metastatic cases)in a 7∶3 ratio.The differences of conventional ultrasound and two-dimensional shear wave elastography parameters between axillary lymph node metastatic and non-metastatic cases in the modeling set were compared,including tumor location,maximum diameter,morphology,margin,echogenicity,calcification,mean Young's modulus value and lymph node hilum structure,cortical echogenicity,longitudinal diameter,transverse diameter,lymph node cortex-to-medulla area ratio(LCMR),as well as blood flow parameters for both tumor and lymph node,such as peak systolic velocity(PSV),end-diastolic velocity(EDV),PSV-to-EDV ratio(S/D),resistance index(RI),pulsatility index(PI).Binary Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the independent influencing factors for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.Based on these factors,a conventional ultrasound model,a 2D-SWE model,and a combined diagnostic model were constructed,respectively.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve,calibration curve,and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the predictive performance,calibration degree and clinical applicability of each model in the modeling and validation sets,the results was compared.Results There were significant differences in tumor maximum diameter,PSV,RI,mean Young's modulus value and lymph node portal structure,cortical echo,LCMR,PSV and S/D between axillary lymph node metastatic and non-metastatic cases in the modeling set(all P<0.05).Binary Logistic regression analysis showed that the tumor maximum diameter,the mean Young's modulus value,PSV and lymph node PSV,LCMR were independent influencing factors for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer(all P<0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of 2D-SWE model,conventional ultrasound model and combined diagnostic model for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer were 0.75,0.77,0.91 and 0.73,0.77,0.90,respectively.The area under the curve of combined diagnostic model was higher than that of the other two models in the modeling set and verification set,the difference were statistically significant(both P<0.05).Calibration curve showed that the calibration curve of the combined diagnostic model was consistent with the ideal curve,while the calibration curves of the 2D-SWE model and the conventional ultrasound model deviates from the ideal curve.Compared with the 2D-SWE model and conventional ultrasound model,the combined diagnostic model had higher H-L value and lower Brier score,with statistically significant differences(all P<0.05).Decision curve showed that the clinical net benefit of combined diagnostic model for predicting the axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer in the modeling set and the validation set were higher.The net reclassification index and comprehensive discrimination improvement index of the modeling set and the validation set were 15.18%,12.36%and 17.14%,14.20%,respectively,which were significantly higher than those of 2D-SWE model and conventional ultrasound model in the same data set(all P<0.05).Conclusion The combined diagnostic model based on 2D-SWE and conventional ultrasound parameters significantly improves the accuracy of predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer,and has better clinical application value.

UltrasonographyShear wave elastographyBreast cancerAxillary lymph node metastasisPredictive model

郭旭、余卫峰、王丽玲、林少坤、曾志雄

展开 >

362000 福建省泉州市,福建医科大学附属泉州第一医院超声科

超声检查 剪切波弹性成像 乳腺癌 腋窝淋巴结转移 预测模型

2024

临床超声医学杂志
重庆医科大学第二临床学院,重庆医科大学附属第二医院

临床超声医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.845
ISSN:1008-6978
年,卷(期):2024.26(12)