首页|25例外周性眩晕患者动态视敏度筛查试验结果分析

25例外周性眩晕患者动态视敏度筛查试验结果分析

扫码查看
目的:观察外周性眩晕患者动态视敏度(dynamic visual acuity,DVA)筛查试验结果并探讨其临床意义.方法:48名健康志愿者作为对照组,25例外周性眩晕患者作为试验组,其中前庭神经炎患者12例,Hunt综合征患者1例,突发性聋伴眩晕5例,双侧前庭功能下降患者7例.进行水平与垂直动态视敏度筛查试验.将试验组与对照组的水平、垂直动态视敏度丢失行数进行比较;对试验组内水平、垂直丢失行数进行比较;将试验组内单、双侧前庭功能分别与对照组进行比较.结果:对照组水平DVA丢失行数中位数为1.5,垂直DVA丢失行数中位数为1.0;试验组水平DVA丢失行数中位数为6.0,垂直DVA丢失行数中位数为5.0.对照组和试验组的水平、垂直丢失行数比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01).试验组组内水平和垂直丢失行数比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).将试验组分为单侧前庭功能下降组(18例)和双侧前庭功能下降组(7例),与对照组进行对比,3组两两比较,水平和垂直丢失行数比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),对照组水平和垂直DVA丢失行数明显分别低于单侧前庭功能下降组和双侧前庭功能下降组,单侧前庭功能下降组的水平和垂直丢失行数明显低于双侧前庭功能下降组(P<0.01).25例外周性眩晕患者水平丢失行数与双侧水平半规管vHIT均值之间呈显著相关关系(P<0.01);垂直丢失行数与双侧垂直半规管vHIT均值之间呈显著相关关系(P<0.01).结论:DVA筛查试验是现有外周前庭功能检查特别是vHIT测试的有效补充,能快速评估前庭功能下降患者的2 Hz前庭眼反射损伤程度.
Dynamic visual acuity screening test results analysis of 25 patients with peripheral vertigo
Objective:To observe the results of dynamic visual acuity screening tests in patients with peripher-al vertigo and explore its clinical significance.Methods:The number of 48 healthy volunteers were enrolled as con-trol group and 25 peripheral vertigo patients as experimental group.In the experimental group,there are 12 pa-tients with vestibular neuritis,1 patient with Hunt syndrome,5 patients with sudden deafness with vertigo and 7 patients with bilateral vestibular dysfunction.Horizontal and vertical dynamic visual acuity screening tests were performed on them.The number of lost rows of horizontal and vertical dynamic visual acuity was compared be-tween the control group and the experimental group to figure out if there is a statistical difference.The number of lost rows of horizontal and vertical dynamic visual acuity was compared within the experimental group to figure out if there is a statistical difference.The two groups of 18 cases of unilateral vestibular function decline and 7 cases of bilateral vestibular function decline in the experimental group were compared with the control group,and figure out if there is a statistical difference.Results:The median number of lost rows of horizontal dynamic visual acuity in 48 healthy volunteers was 1.5 and median number of lost rows of vertical dynamic visual acuity was 1.0 in the control group.The median number of lost rows of horizontal dynamic visual acuity of 26 healthy volunteers was 6 and median number of lost rows of vertical dynamic visual acuity was 5 in the experimental group.Compared to the experimental group,the number of lost rows both have statistical significance in horizontal and vertical dynam-ic visual acuity(P<0.01).The comparison of horizontal and vertical lost rows within the test group also have sta-tistical significance(P<0.01).Twenty five patients with exceptional vestibular disease in the experimental group were divided into unilateral vestibular function reduction group(n=18)and bilateral vestibular function reduction group(n=7).Compared with the control group,there was significant differences in the number of horizontal and vertical lost rows(P<0.01)within the three groups.After pairwise comparison,the number of lost rows of hori-zontal and vertical in the control group was significantly lower than that in the unilateral vestibular function reduc-tion group and the bilateral vestibular function reduction group(P<0.01).There was a highly significant correla-tion between the number of horizontally lost rows of DVA and the mean vHIT values of bilateral horizontal semi-circular canals in 25 patients(P<0.01);and a highly significant correlation between the number of vertically lost rows of DVA and the mean vHIT values of vertical semicircular canals in 4 groups bilaterally(P<0.01).Conclu-sion:The Dynamic Visual Acuity Screening Test is a useful addition to existing tests of peripheral vestibular func-tion,particularly the vHIT test,and provides a rapid assessment of the extent of 2 Hz VOR impairment in pa-tients with reduced vestibular function.

dynamic visual acuityperipheral vertigovestibular function

赵东、姜子刚、李春娇

展开 >

秦皇岛市第一医院耳科(河北秦皇岛,066000)

动态视敏度 外周性眩晕 前庭功能

河北省省级科技计划

21377763D

2024

临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志
华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院

临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.831
ISSN:1001-1781
年,卷(期):2024.38(2)
  • 15