首页|双重血浆分子吸附系统模式治疗高原慢性肝衰竭患者的效果分析

双重血浆分子吸附系统模式治疗高原慢性肝衰竭患者的效果分析

扫码查看
目的 比较世居高原和移居高原慢性肝衰竭患者接受双重血浆分子吸附系统模式(DPMAS)治疗后的临床特征和病死率.方法 选取2016年1月—2021年12月于西藏军区总医院重症监护室接受DPMAS治疗的63例慢性肝衰竭患者.根据患者的旅居史将患者分为世居高原组(n=29)和移居高原组(n=34),对比两组患者的基线资料和接受DPMAS治疗前后的临床特征.符合正态分布的计量资料组间比较采用成组t检验;组内治疗前与治疗后比较应采用配对t检验.非正态分布计量资料组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验;组内治疗前后比较应采用Wilcoxon秩和检验.计数资料组间比较采用χ2检验.Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,死亡风险比较采用Log-rank检验.结果 移居高原组汉族比例明显多于世居高原组(χ2= 41.729,P<0.001);世居高原组患者最近一次高原连续居住时间明显长于移居高原组(Z=3.364,P<0.001);MELD评分、肝性脑病、肝肾综合征和消化道出血发生率均较世居高原组明显增高(Z=2.318,χ2值分别为6.903、5.154、6.262,P值均<0.05).DPMAS治疗前后两组患者的PLT、HGB、ALT、AST、Alb、TBil、DBil、LDH、Cr、INR比较差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05).DPMAS治疗前,移居高原组ALT、AST、TBil、DBil、LDH、Cr、BUN和INR均较世居高原组高(P值均<0.05),HGB较世居高原组低(P<0.05);DPMAS治疗后,移居高原组患者PLT和HGB数量下降较世居高原组更为显著(P值均<0.05),但ALT、AST、TBil、DBil、LDH、BUN和INR均仍较世居高原组高(P值均<0.05).世居高原组和移居高原组患者接受DPMAS治疗后 60天病死率分别为 52.5%(95%CI:41.7~63.8)和 81.3%(95%CI:77.9~85.6).相比于世居高原组(HR=0.47,95%CI:0.23~0.95),移居高原组患者60天死亡风险(HR=2.14,95%CI:1.06~4.32)明显增加(P=0.039).结论 与世居高原慢性肝衰竭患者相比,移居高原患者的肝功能损伤更重,DPMAS治疗后肝功能改善程度较弱,同时病死率更高.临床医护人员需要加强对移居高原慢性肝衰竭患者的重视,尽可能提高患者生存率.
Clinical effect of double plasma molecular adsorption system in treatment of patients with chronic liver failure in high-altitude areas
Objective To investigate the differences in clinical features and mortality rate between native patients with chronic liver failure(CHF)and migrated patients with CHF after treatment with double plasma molecular adsorption system(DPMAS)in high-altitude areas.Methods A total of 63 patients with CHF who received DPMAS treatment in the intensive care unit of General Hospital of Tibet Military Command from January 2016 to December 2021 were enrolled,and according to their history of residence in high-altitude areas,they were divided into native group with 29 patients and migrated group with 34 patients.The two groups were compared in terms of baseline data and clinical features before and after DPMAS treatment.The independent-samples t test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between groups,and the paired t-test was used for comparison before and after treatment within each group;the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between groups,and the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used for comparison before and after treatment within each group;the chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical data between groups.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot survival curves,and the Log-rank test was used for comparison of the risk of death.Results Compared with the native group,the migrated group had a significantly higher proportion of Chinese Han patients(χ2=41.729,P<0.001),and compared with the migrated group,the native group had a significantly longer duration of the most recent continuous residence in high-altitude areas(Z=3.364,P<0.001).Compared with the native group,the migrated group had significantly higher MELD score and incidence rates of hepatic encephalopathy,hepatorenal syndrome,and gastrointestinal bleeding(Z=2.318,χ2=6.903,5.154,and 6.262,all P<0.05).Both groups had significant changes in platelet count(PLT),hemoglobin count(HGB),alanine aminotransferase(ALT),aspartate aminotransferase(AST),albumin,total bilirubin(TBil),direct bilirubin(DBil),lactate dehydrogenase(LDH),creatinine(Cr),and international normalized ratio(INR)after DPMAS treatment(all P<0.05).Before DPMAS treatment,compared with the native group,the migrated group had significantly higher levels of ALT,AST,TBil,DBil,LDH,Cr,BUN,and INR(all P<0.05)and a significantly lower level of HGB(P<0.05);after DPMAS treatment,compared with the native group,the migrated group had significantly greater reductions in PLT and HGB(both P<0.05)and still significantly higher levels of ALT,AST,TBil,DBil,LDH,BUN,and INR(all P<0.05).The 60-day mortality rate of patients after DPMAS treatment was 52.5%(95%confidence interval[CI]:41.7—63.8)in the native group and 81.3%(95%CI:77.9—85.6)in the migrated group.Compared with the native group(hazard ratio[HR]=0.47,95%CI:0.23—0.95),the migrated group had a significant increase in the risk of death on day 60(HR=2.14,95%CI:1.06—4.32,P=0.039).Conclusion Compared with the native patients with CHF in high-altitude areas,migrated patients have a higher degree of liver impairment,a lower degree of improvement in liver function after DPMAS treatment,and a higher mortality rate.Clinical medical staff need to pay more attention to migrated patients with CHF,so as to improve their survival rates.

Liver,ArtificialLiver FailureAltitude Sickness

王博文、彭梦佳、江历恒、方斐、王宇亮、沈元弟

展开 >

西藏军区总医院重症医学中心,拉萨 850000

海军特色医学中心急诊科,上海 200000

肝,人工 肝功能衰竭 高原病

2024

临床肝胆病杂志
吉林大学

临床肝胆病杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.428
ISSN:1001-5256
年,卷(期):2024.40(1)
  • 16