首页|双重血浆分子吸附系统序贯血浆置换联合连续性肾脏替代疗法治疗慢加急性肝衰竭合并急性肾损伤的效果分析

双重血浆分子吸附系统序贯血浆置换联合连续性肾脏替代疗法治疗慢加急性肝衰竭合并急性肾损伤的效果分析

扫码查看
目的 观察双重血浆分子吸附系统(DPMAS)序贯血浆置换(PE)联合连续性肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)治疗慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)合并急性肾损伤(AKI)患者的临床效果.方法 回顾性纳入2019年1月—2022年12月于贵州医科大学附属医院住院治疗的ACLF合并AKI的90例患者临床资料,依据不同的血液净化方式,分为DPMAS序贯PE联合CRRT组(观察组,n=31),DPMAS序贯PE组(对照组,n=59).收集所有患者入院一般资料、血液净化治疗前后实验室指标,包括肝肾功能、凝血功能、炎症指标等,计算eGFR、MELD-Na评分.正态分布的计量资料两组间比较采用成组t检验;非正态分布的计量资料组内前后比较采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验,两组间比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验.计数资料两组比较采用χ2检验或Fisher精确检验.结果 观察组治疗有效率为48.4%(15/31),高于对照组治疗的有效率27.1%(16/59)(χ2=4.071,P= 0.044).两组血液净化方式均可有效改善TBil、ALT、AST、PTA、Scr、PCT、CRP、eGFR及MELD-Na评分(P值均<0.05);两组治疗后PLT及Hb均显著降低(P值均<0.05);而BUN、Alb、INR治疗前后差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05).对照组与观察组的AST、Scr、PCT、eGFR、MELD-Na评分、Hb、PLT治疗前后差值比较,差异均有统计学意义(P值均<0.05).结论 DPMAS序贯PE联合CRRT模式可有效清除炎症介质,改善肾功能,稳定机体内环境,获得较好的临床疗效.
Clinical efficacy of double plasma molecular absorption system and sequential plasma exchange combined with continuous renal replacement therapy in treatment of acute-on-chronic liver failure with acute kidney injury
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of double plasma molecular adsorption system(DPMAS)and sequential plasma exchange(PE)combined with continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT)in the treatment of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF)and acute kidney injury(AKI).Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 90 patients with ACLF and AKI who were hospitalized in The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University from January 2019 to December 2022,and according to the method for blood purification,they were divided into DPMAS sequential PE+ CRRT group(observation group with 31 patients)and DPMAS sequential PE group(control group with 59 patients).General data on admission and laboratory markers before and after blood purification were collected from all patients,including hepatic and renal function,coagulation function,and inflammation markers,and estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)and MELD combined with serum sodium concentration(MELD-Na)score were calculated.The independent-samples t test was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between two groups;the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data within each group before and after treatment,and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between two groups;the chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups.Results The observation group had a significantly higher response rate than the control group[48.4%(15/31)vs 27.1%(16/59),χ2=4.071,P=0.044].The methods for blood purification in both groups could effectively improve total bilirubin,alanine aminotransferase,aspartate aminotransferase(AST),prothrombin time activity,serum creatinine(Scr),procalcitonin(PCT),C-reactive protein,eGFR,and MELD-Na score(all P<0.05),and both groups had significant reductions in platelet count(PLT)and hemoglobin(Hb)after treatment(all P<0.05),while there were no significant changes in blood urea nitrogen,albumin,and international normalized ratio after treatment(all P>0.05).There were significant differences between the two groups in the changes in AST,Scr,PCT,eGFR,MELD-Na score,Hb,and PLT after treatment(all P<0.05).Conclusion DPMAS sequential PE combined with CRRT can effectively remove inflammatory mediators,improve renal function,stabilize the internal environment of human body,and achieve a relatively good clinical efficacy.

Acute-On-Chronic Liver FailureAcute Kidney InjuryPlasma ExchangeDouble Plasma Molecular Adsorption SystemContinuous Renal Replacement Therapy

文苑、祝娟娟

展开 >

贵州医科大学附属医院感染科,贵阳 550002

慢加急性肝功能衰竭 急性肾损伤 血浆置换 双重血浆分子吸附系统 连续性肾脏替代疗法

北京肝胆相照公益基金会人工肝专项基金课题贵州省科技厅基础研究计划项目

RGGJJ-2021-001黔科合基础-ZK[2022]一般452

2024

临床肝胆病杂志
吉林大学

临床肝胆病杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.428
ISSN:1001-5256
年,卷(期):2024.40(3)
  • 29