首页|94例不明原因肝损伤患者肝穿刺病理诊断与临床特征分析

94例不明原因肝损伤患者肝穿刺病理诊断与临床特征分析

扫码查看
目的 总结不明原因肝损伤患者的肝穿刺病理诊断与临床特征,探讨超声引导下肝穿刺活检在诊断不明原因肝损伤中的价值.方法 回顾性分析厦门大学附属中山医院2018年1月—2023年2月共94例因不明原因肝损伤入院患者的临床资料及超声引导下肝穿刺活检结果.根据最终诊断占比排名前5位分为自身免疫性肝病(AILD)组、代谢相关脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)组、药物性肝损伤(DILI)组、酒精性肝病(ALD)组和原因不明组.正态分布的计量资料多组间比较采用单因素方差分析,进一步两两比较采用Bonferroni分析或Dunnett'T3检验;非正态分布的计量资料多组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验.计数资料多组间比较采用Fisher确切检验.结果 94例不明原因肝损伤患者入院后均进行超声引导下肝穿刺活检,90例(95.7%)患者在结合肝穿刺病理诊断与临床特征后可明确诊断,其中AILD 43例(45.7%);MAFLD 21例(22.3%);DILI 15例(16.0%);ALD 6例(6.4%);AILD合并MAFLD 1例(1.1%);血色病1例(1.1%);布加综合征1例(1.1%);先天性肝纤维化1例(1.1%);特发性门静脉高压1例(1.1%),肝活检后病因仍不明确4例(4.3%).排名前5位诊断患者的年龄(F=4.457)、BMI(F=3.245)、AST(H=11.128)、GGT(H=24.789)、ALP(H=26.013)、IgG(H=19.099)、IgM(H=21.263)、抗线粒体抗体M2亚型阳性率、ANA阳性率差异均存在统计学意义(P值均<0.05).其中,与MAFLD组相比,AILD组的年龄、AST、GGT、ALP升高,BMI降低;与MAFLD组和DILI组相比,AILD组IgG、IgM升高;与其他4组相比,AILD组抗线粒体抗体M2亚型阳性率与ANA阳性率升高.结论 不明原因肝损伤患者中,AILD、MAFLD和DILI最常见.超声引导下肝穿刺活检在诊断不明原因肝损伤中发挥重要作用,但仍需结合临床病史、不同肝损伤类型、实验室指标及影像学资料综合分析.
Liver biopsy and clinical features of liver injury of unknown origin:An analysis of 94 cases
Objective To summarize the liver biopsy and clinical features of patients with liver injury of unknown origin,and to investigate the value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy in the diagnosis of liver injury of unknown origin.Methods A retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data and ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy results of 94 patients with liver injury of unknown origin who were admitted to Zhongshan Hospital,Xiamen University,from January 2018 to February 2023.According to the proportion of the patients with different final diagnoses,the patients were divided into autoimmune liver disease(AILD)group,metabolic associated fatty liver disease(MAFLD)group,drug-induced liver injury(DILI)group,alcoholic liver disease(ALD)group,and unknown group.An analysis of variance was used for comparison of normally distributed continuous data between multiple groups,and the Bonferroni analysis or the Dunnett'T3 test was used for further comparison between two groups;the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for comparison of non-normally distributed continuous data between multiple groups;the Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between multiple groups.Results All 94 patients with liver injury of unknown origin underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy after admission,among whom 90 patients(95.7%)had a confirmed diagnosis based on liver biopsy and clinical features.There were 43 patients(45.7%)with AILD,21(22.3%)with MAFLD,15(16.0%)with DILI,6(6.4%)with ALD,1(1.1%)with AILD and MAFLD,1(1.1%)with hemochromatosis,1(1.1%)with Budd-Chiari syndrome,1(1.1%)with congenital hepatic fibrosis,and 1(1.1%)with idiopathic portal hypertension,while 4 patients(4.3%)still had an unknown etiology after liver biopsy.There were significant differences between the patients with top five diagnoses in age(F=4.457,P<0.05),body mass index(BMI)(F=3.245,P<0.05),aspartate aminotransferase(AST)(H=11.128,P<0.05),gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase(GGT)(H=24.789,P<0.05),alkaline phosphatase(ALP)(H=26.013,P<0.05),IgG(H=19.099,P<0.05),IgM(H=21.263,P<0.05),AMA-M2 positive rate(P<0.05),and ANA positive rate(P<0.05).Compared with the MAFLD group,the AILD group had significantly higher age,AST,GGT,and ALP and a significantly lower BMI;compared with the MAFLD group and the DILI group,the AILD group had significant increases in IgG and IgM;the AILD group had significant increases in the positive rates of AMA-M2 and ANA compared with the other four groups.Conclusion AILD,MAFLD,and DILI are the most common causes in patients with liver injury of unknown origin.Ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy plays an important role in determining the cause of liver injury of unknown origin,but it is still needed to make a comprehensive analysis based on clinical history,different types of liver injury,laboratory markers,and imaging data.

Liver DiseasesDiagnosis,DifferentialEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration

李纾绮、陈美娅、宋阳、周飞、陈二妹、陈立刚、周静平

展开 >

福建医科大学临床医学部,福州 350100

厦门大学附属中山医院消化内科,国家临床重点专科,福建 厦门 361004

肝疾病 诊断,鉴别 内镜超声引导细针穿刺

福建省自然科学基金

2021J05278

2024

临床肝胆病杂志
吉林大学

临床肝胆病杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.428
ISSN:1001-5256
年,卷(期):2024.40(5)
  • 18