临床和实验医学杂志2024,Vol.23Issue(1) :91-94.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2024.01.024

化学发光免疫分析法和液相色谱-串联质谱法检测儿童血清25-羟基维生素D的一致性研究

Analysis of consistency of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels by chemiluminmescence immunoassay and liquid chromatography-tan-dem mass spectrometry in children

马少杰 毕颖薇 胡文娟 时琰丽 韩颖 王红
临床和实验医学杂志2024,Vol.23Issue(1) :91-94.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2024.01.024

化学发光免疫分析法和液相色谱-串联质谱法检测儿童血清25-羟基维生素D的一致性研究

Analysis of consistency of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels by chemiluminmescence immunoassay and liquid chromatography-tan-dem mass spectrometry in children

马少杰 1毕颖薇 1胡文娟 1时琰丽 2韩颖 1王红1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 民航总医院儿科 北京 100123
  • 2. 民航总医院检验科 北京 100123
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 比较化学发光免疫分析法(化学发光法)和液相色谱-串联质谱法(液相质谱法)检测儿童血清25-羟基维生素D[25(OH)D]的一致性.方法 前瞻性选取2016年9月至2017年9月于民航总医院儿科健康体检的155名1~14岁儿童为研究对象.留取血清,化学发光法直接测定25(OH)D含量,液相质谱法分别测定25(OH)D2含量和25(OH)D3含量,再求和得到25(OH)D含量.应用Passing-Bablock回归、组内相关系数(ICC)、Bland-Altman分析比较检测结果,用加权Kappa评价两种方法诊断维生素D营养状态的一致性.结果 液相质谱法检测血清25(OH)D含量平均为(29.34±6.93)ng/mL,高于化学发光法[(27.74±8.06)ng/mL],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).组内相关系数ICC为0.913,两个检测方法具有一致性.Bland-Altman分析显示两种检测方法的差值平均为1.6 ng/mL,95%CI:-6.2~9.4.化学发光法和液相质谱法呈线性相关,R2=0.760,P<0.010,回归方程为Y=1.285X-9.813.化学发光法与液相质谱法的Passing-Bablock回归方程斜率为1.285(95%CI:1.177~1.406),截距为-9.813(95%CI:-13.256~6.623).化学发光法判断维生素D营养水平与液相质谱法总体符合率为92.90%(144/155),加权Kappa=0.412,两者检测方法不一致可接受.结论 化学发光法和液相质谱法评估健康儿童25(OH)D的相关性和一致性可接受.在评价和监测儿童维生素D营养状况时,应充分考虑不同方法学间各自存在的差异,兼顾准确性和可行性.

Abstract

Objective To compare the consistency between chemiluminescence immunoassay(chemiluminescence)and liquid chroma-tography-tandem mass spectrometry(LC-MS/MS)in detecting serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D[25(OH)D]in children.Methods A total of 155 children(1-14 years old)who underwent pediatric physical examination in Civil Aviation General Hospital from September 2016 to Septem-ber 2017 were prospectively selected as the subjects.The serums from children were collected,the concentration of 25(OH)D was determined by chemiluminescence immunoassay,and the concentrations of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 were determined by LC-MS/MS,and then summed up to obtain the content of 25(OH)D.The test results were compared using Passing Bablock regression,intra group correlation coefficient(ICC),and Blank Altman analysis.The consistency of the two methods in diagnosing vitamin D nutritional status was evaluated using weighted Kappa method.Results The average serum 25(OH)D content detected by LC-MS/MS was(29.34±6.93)ng/mL,which was higher than that de-tected by chemiluminescence[(27.74±8.06)ng/mL],and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The intra group correlation coefficient(ICC)was 0.913,indicating consistency between the two detection methods.The Bland Altman plot showed that the average difference between the two detection methods was 1.6 ng/mL,95%CI:-6.2-9.4.There was a linear correlation between chemiluminescence and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry,R2=0.760,P<0.010,and the regression equation was Y=1.285X-9.813.The slope of the Passing Bablock regression equation for chemiluminescence and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was 1.285(95%CI:1.177-1.406),and the intercept was-9.813(95%CI:-13.256-6.623).The overall agreement rate between the chemiluminescence method for determining vita-min D nutritional levels and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry was 92.90%(144/155),weighted Kappa=0.412.Conclusion The corre-lation and consistency between chemiluminescence and LC-MS/MS in evaluating 25(OH)D in healthy children are acceptable.When we assess and monitor vitamin D nutrition,it is necessary to consider the difference between testing method and to further ensure the accuracy and feasibility.

关键词

25-羟基维生素D/化学发光免疫分析法/液相色谱-串联质谱法

Key words

25-hydroxyvitamin D/Chemiluminescence immunoassay/Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

首都卫生发展青年基金(首发2014-4-6031)

出版年

2024
临床和实验医学杂志
首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院

临床和实验医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.504
ISSN:1671-4695
参考文献量3
段落导航相关论文