临床和实验医学杂志2024,Vol.23Issue(9) :956-959.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2024.09.016

经皮椎板间入路脊柱内镜手术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床效果及对其疼痛和脊柱功能的影响

Clinical outcomes and impact on pain and spinal function in patients with single segment lumbar disc herniation undergoing percutane-ous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy

屈锡亮 罗林峰 叶永胜 黎立荣
临床和实验医学杂志2024,Vol.23Issue(9) :956-959.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2024.09.016

经皮椎板间入路脊柱内镜手术治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床效果及对其疼痛和脊柱功能的影响

Clinical outcomes and impact on pain and spinal function in patients with single segment lumbar disc herniation undergoing percutane-ous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy

屈锡亮 1罗林峰 1叶永胜 1黎立荣1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 东莞市中医院骨科 广东 东莞 523000
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 探究经皮椎板间入路脊柱内镜手术(PEID)治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者的临床效果及对其疼痛程度和脊柱功能的影响.方法 前瞻性选取2021年3月至2023年3月东莞市中医院收治的96例单节段腰椎间盘突出患者作为研究对象 按照随机数字表法将患者分为两组:传统手术组(n=48)和PEID组(n=48).传统手术组给予传统手术治疗,PEID组给予PEID 手术.比较两组患者的术后治疗效果,手术前、手术后6个月的疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、Oswsetry 功能障碍指数(ODI)、腰椎活动度[日本矫形学学会(JOA)评分]以及术后并发症.结果 PEID组的总有效率为 95.83%,高于传统手术组(81.25%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).手术后6 个月,两 组 VAS评分、ODI 评 分均低于手术前,JOA 评分均高于手术前,PEID组手术后6个月的 VAS 评分、ODI 评分分别为(1.98±0.46)、(12.46±1.62)分,均低于传统手术组[(2.53±0.65)、(18.12±2.13)分],JOA 评 分为(19.67±2.98)分,高于传统手术组[(15.12±1.73)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).传统手术组和PEID组的总并发症发生率比较(12.50%vs.4.17%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 PEID 手术对单节段腰椎间盘突出症患者的疗效较好,减轻患者疼痛感,改善患者脊柱功能,且并发症较少.

Abstract

Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes and impact on pain and spinal function in patients with single segment lumbar disc herniation undergoing percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy(PEID).Methods A total of 96 patients with single segment lumbar disc herniation admitted to Dongguan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital from March 2021 to March 2023 were prospectively selected as the study subjects.According to the random number table method,patients were divided into two groups:the traditional surgery group(n=48)and the PEID group(n=48).The traditional surgical group received traditional surgical treatment,while the PEID group received PEID surgery.The therapeutic efficacy after surgery,pain score[visual analog scale(VAS)],Oswsetry dysfunction index(ODI),lumbar range of motion score[Japanese Orthopedic Association(JO A)score]before surgery and after 6 months of surgery,and postoperative complications of the patients were compared.Results The total effective rate of the PEID group was 95.83%,which was higher than that of the traditional surgery group(81.25%),and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After 6 months of surgery,the VAS and ODI scores of two groups were lower than those before surgery,and the JOA scores were higher than those before surgery,the VAS and ODI scores of the PEID group at 6 months after sur-gery were(1.98±0.46)and(12.46±1.62)points,respectively,which were lower than those of the traditional surgery group[(2.53±0.65)and(18.12±2.13)points],the JOA score were(19.67±2.98)points,which was higher than that of the traditional surgery group[(15.12±1.73)points],and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no obvious difference in the total incidence of complica-tions between the traditional surgical group and the PEID group(12.50%vs.4.17%)(P>0.05).Conclusion PEID surgery has a good ther-apeutic efficacy on patients with single segment lumbar disc herniation,reduces pain,improves spinal function,and has fewer complications.

关键词

经皮椎板间入路脊柱内镜手术/单节段腰椎间盘突出/疼痛/脊柱功能

Key words

Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy/Single-segment lumbar disc herniation/Pain/Spinal function

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2019A1515110717)

东莞市社会发展科技项目(20211800900032)

出版年

2024
临床和实验医学杂志
首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院

临床和实验医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.504
ISSN:1671-4695
段落导航相关论文