临床和实验医学杂志2024,Vol.23Issue(10) :1013-1017.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2024.10.002

替罗非班及双联抗血小板治疗超溶栓时间窗急性进展性脑梗死患者的效果

Effect of tirofiban and dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute progressive cerebral infarction with hyperthrombolytic time win-dow

陈瑞清 董育卿 李鹏程 李艳军 边林
临床和实验医学杂志2024,Vol.23Issue(10) :1013-1017.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2024.10.002

替罗非班及双联抗血小板治疗超溶栓时间窗急性进展性脑梗死患者的效果

Effect of tirofiban and dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute progressive cerebral infarction with hyperthrombolytic time win-dow

陈瑞清 1董育卿 1李鹏程 1李艳军 1边林1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 大同市第五人民医院神经内科 山西 大同 037006
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 分析替罗非班及双联抗血小板治疗超溶栓时间窗急性进展性脑梗死(APCI)患者的效果.方法 前瞻性选取2021年12月至2022年12月大同市第五人民医院神经内科收治的超溶栓时间窗APCI患者70例,按照随机数字表法将其分为常规组和联合组,每组各35例.两组均采取常规治疗,常规组在常规治疗基础上采用阿司匹林+氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗,联合组在常规治疗基础上采用替罗非班+双联抗血小板治疗.比较两组的临床疗效,并对两组治疗前、治疗14 d后神经功能[采用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分评估]、日常生活能力[采用日常生活能力评定量表(ADL)进行评估]、炎症因子[超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)]水平以及治疗过程中的不良反应发生情况进行比较.结果 联合组总有效率和常规组总有效率(91.42%vs.85.71%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).治疗14 d后,两组NIHSS评分均较治疗前降低,ADL评分均较治疗前升高,且联合组NIHSS评分为(4.52±1.67)分,低于常规组(6.28±1.78)分,ADL评分为(84.23±6.58分),高于常规组[(74.34±7.12)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗14 d后,两组hs-CRP、IL-6水平均较治疗前降低,且联合组hs-CRP、IL-6水平分别为(11.03±3.68)mg/L、(60.73±13.42)ng/mL,均低于常规组[(13.55±4.12)mg/L、(78.48±14.57)ng/mL],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).在治疗过程中,联合组不良反应发生率和常规组的不良反应发生率比较(8.57%vs.11.43%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 对于超溶栓时间窗急性进展性脑梗死患者,在双联抗血小板治疗的基础上联合替罗非班治疗,可取得更好的治疗效果,可以更好地改善患者的神经功能、日常生活能力以及降低炎症反应.

Abstract

Objective To analyze the efficacy of tirofiban and dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute progressive cerebral infarc-tion(APCI)with hyperthrombolytic time window.Methods A prospective selection of 70 APCI patients admitted to the Department of Neurolo-gy,the Fifth people's Hospital of Datong City from December 2021 to December 2022 with a time window of thrombolysis was conducted.Patients were divided into the conventional group and the combination group according to the random numble table method,with 35 cases in each group.Both groups received conventional treatment.The conventional group received aspirin+clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy in addition to conven-tional treatment,while the combination group received tirofiban+dual antiplatelet therapy in addition to conventional treatment.The clinical effi-cacy of the two groups were compared.And the neurological function[assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)score],daily living ability[assessed using the ability daily living scale(ADL)],inflammatory factors[high-sensitivity C-reactive protein(hs-CRP),interleukin-6(IL-6)]levels,and incidence of adverse reactions during treatment between two groups were compared.Results There was no statistically significant difference in the total effective rate between the combined group and the conventional group(91.42%vs.85.71%)(P>0.05).After 14 days of treatment,the NIHSS scores of the two groups were lower than those before treatment,while the ADL scores were higher than those before treatment,the NIHSS score of the combination group was(4.52±1.67)points,which was lower than that of the conventional group(6.28±1.78)points,and the ADL score was(84.23±6.58)points,which was higher than that of the conventional group[(74.34±7.12)points],the difference were statistically significant(P<0.05).After 14 days of treatment,the levels of hs CRP and IL-6 in two groups were lower than those before treatment,the levels of hs-CRP and IL-6 in the combination group were(11.03±3.68)mg/L and(60.73±13.42)ng/mL,respectively,which were lower than those in the conventional group[(13.55±4.12)mg/L and(78.48±14.57)ng/mL],and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).During the treatment process,there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the combination group and the conventional group(8.57%vs.11.43%)(P>0.05).Conclusion For patients with acute progressive cerebral infarction with hyperthrombolytic time window,combined treatment with tirofiban on the basis of dual anti-platelet therapy can achieve better therapeutic effect,which can better improve the nerve function,daily living ability and reduce inflammation.

关键词

脑梗死/替罗非班/双联抗血小板/神经功能/日常生活能力/炎症反应

Key words

Brain infarction/Tirofiban/Dual antiplatelet/Nerve function/Ability of daily living/Inflammatory response

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

山西省自然科学基金(201801D121318)

出版年

2024
临床和实验医学杂志
首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院

临床和实验医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.504
ISSN:1671-4695
段落导航相关论文