首页|强制医疗暴力危险性评估专家共识在实际运用中的对照分析

强制医疗暴力危险性评估专家共识在实际运用中的对照分析

扫码查看
目的:探讨强制医疗暴力危险性评估专家共识在实际运用中的效果.方法:纳入2013 年1 月1 日至2022 年5 月31 日对强制医疗法律实施后杭州市公安局安康医院收治的强制医疗患者 104例,其中55 例已经解除强治疗(解除组),还在接受强制医疗的患者49 例(待解组),运用自编临床资料调查表和暴力危险性评估专家共识进行评估,比较两组间的差异,确定其危险等级,并随访解除组解除后的状况.结果:两组患者强制医疗的时间、暴力风险等级比较差异均有统计学意义(t=-3.372、-7.104,P均<0.01);在疾病严重程度、犯罪类型方面的比较,其差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.392,P=0.531;χ2=1.089,P=0.293).结论:强制医疗暴力危险性评估专家共识为强制医疗工作带来了极大的指导性作用.
A comparative analysis of the expert consensus on the assessment of the risk of forced medical violence in practice
Objective:To investigate the effect of expert consensus on the risk assessment of forced med-ical violence in practical application.Method:A total of 104 patients of compulsory treatment admitted to Ankang Hospital of Hangzhou police station after the implementation of the compulsory treatment law from Janu-ary 1,2013 to May 31,2022 were included,of which 55 patients had been released from compulsory treatment(discharge group)and 49 patients were still receiving compulsory treatment(pending treatment group).A self-developed clinical data questionnaire and expert consensus on violence risk assessment were used to evaluate the differences between the two groups,determine their risk levels,and follow up the status of the dissolved group.Results:There were significant differences in duration of compulsory treatment,and risk level of violence be-tween the two groups(t=-3.372、-7.104,both P<0.01),and there were no significant differences in dis-ease severity and crime type between the two groups(χ2=0.392,P=0.531;χ2=1.089,P=0.293).Conclusion:The expert consensus on the assessment of the risk of violence in compulsory medical treatment has brought great guidance to the work of forced medical treatment.

compulsory medical treatmentrisk assessmentexpert consensus

潘金灯、马斌方、邱晔

展开 >

310000 浙江台州市临海康宁医院

杭州市公安局安康医院

浙江省立同德医院

强制医疗 危险性评估 专家共识

2024

临床精神医学杂志
南京医科大学附属脑科医院

临床精神医学杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:1.108
ISSN:1005-3220
年,卷(期):2024.34(3)