临床误诊误治2023,Vol.36Issue(8) :122-126.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2023.08.026

超声心动图和多层螺旋CT对急诊主动脉夹层的诊断效能对比

Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy of Echocardiography and Multi-slice Spiral CT in Emergency Aortic Dissection

杨超 彭莹子 李玉峰 张梦 熊智巍
临床误诊误治2023,Vol.36Issue(8) :122-126.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2023.08.026

超声心动图和多层螺旋CT对急诊主动脉夹层的诊断效能对比

Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy of Echocardiography and Multi-slice Spiral CT in Emergency Aortic Dissection

杨超 1彭莹子 2李玉峰 1张梦 1熊智巍3
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 617000 四川攀枝花,攀枝花市中心医院超声科
  • 2. 617000 四川攀枝花,攀枝花市疾病预防控制中心
  • 3. 617000 四川攀枝花,攀枝花市中心医院 血管疾病科
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 分析超声心动图和多层螺旋CT对急诊主动脉夹层的诊断价值.方法 选取 2020 年 1 月—2022 年10 月经主动脉造影确诊的主动脉夹层 180 例.比较超声心动图与多层螺旋CT对主动脉夹层的诊断价值.结果 本研究中180 例主动脉夹层,其中Stanford A型123 例(68.3%),Stanford B型57 例(31.7%).超声心动图诊断主动脉夹层的总体符合率为95.6%(172/180),其中对Stanford A型主动脉夹层诊断的符合率为100%(123/123),与多层螺旋CT比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).超声心动图对Stanford B型主动脉夹层诊断的符合率为 86.0%(49/57),低于多层螺旋CT的100%(57/57)(P<0.05).超声心动图对主动脉瓣异常诊断的符合率为 100%(129/129),高于多层螺旋CT的82.9%(107/129)(P<0.05).超声心动图对主动脉弓异常诊断的符合率为 96.2%(153/159),低于多层螺旋CT的100%(159/159).结论 在诊断和评估主动脉夹层时,超声心动图与多层螺旋CT各有优缺点和诊断价值,在患者血流动力学稳定情况下应联合应用,从而对主动脉夹层和心脏功能做出全面和准确评估.

Abstract

Objective To analyze the diagnostic value of echocardiography and multi-slice spiral CT in patients with emergency aortic dissection(AD).Methods A total of 180 patients with AD diagnosed by aortic angiography from January 2020 to October 2022 were selected.The diagnostic value of echocardiography and multi-slice spiral CT in AD was compared.Results In this study,there were 180 patients with AD,including 123 cases(68.3%)of Stanford type A and 57 cases(31.7%)of Stanford type B.The overall coincidence rate of echocardiography in the diagnosis of AD was 95.6%(172/180),and the coincidence rate of Stanford type A AD was 100%(123/123),which had no significant difference compared with multi-slice spiral CT(P>0.05).The coincidence rate of Stanford type B AD by echocardiography was 86.0%(49/57),which was lower than that of multi-slice spiral CT(100%,57/57)(P<0.05).The coincidence rate of echocardio-graphy for aortic valve abnormality was 100%(129/129),which was higher than that of multi-slice spiral CT(82.9%,107/129)(P<0.05).The coincidence rate of echocardiography for the diagnosis of abnormal aortic arch was 96.2%(153/159),which was lower than that of multi-slice spiral CT(100%,159/159).Conclusion In the diagnosis and evaluation of AD,echocardiography and multi-slice spiral CT have advantages and disadvantages and diagnostic value,and should be com-bined when the patient's hemodynamics are stable,so as to make a comprehensive and accurate evaluation of the patient's AD and cardiac function.

关键词

动脉瘤,夹层/Stanford/A型/Stanford/B型/主动脉造影术/升主动脉/超声心动图/体层摄影术,螺旋计算机/诊断

Key words

Aneurysm,dissecting/Stanford type A/Stanford type B/Aortography/Ascending aorta/Echocardio-graphy/Tomography,spiral computed/Diagnosis

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

攀枝花市科技计划项目(2020ZD-S-25)

出版年

2023
临床误诊误治
解放军白求恩国际和平医院

临床误诊误治

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.914
ISSN:1002-3429
参考文献量6
段落导航相关论文