临床误诊误治2024,Vol.37Issue(18) :53-58.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2024.18.009

支气管肺泡灌洗液培养和mNGS检测对社区获得性肺炎/医院获得性肺炎的诊断价值

Value of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Culture and mNGS Detection in the Diagnosis of CAP/HAP

黄小欢 何小珊 江玉婷 温雅
临床误诊误治2024,Vol.37Issue(18) :53-58.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3429.2024.18.009

支气管肺泡灌洗液培养和mNGS检测对社区获得性肺炎/医院获得性肺炎的诊断价值

Value of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Culture and mNGS Detection in the Diagnosis of CAP/HAP

黄小欢 1何小珊 1江玉婷 1温雅2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 514031 广东梅州,梅州市人民医院感染性疾病科
  • 2. 514031 广东梅州,梅州市人民医院呼吸与危重症医学科
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 探究支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)培养、宏基因组学二代测序(mNGS)检测在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)/医院获得性肺炎(HAP)中的诊断价值及意义.方法 选取 2022 年 10 月至 2024 年 4 月收治的 81 例CAP/HAP患者,收集BALF,均行微生物培养、mNGS检测,统计BALF微生物培养、mNGS病原体检测结果,比较BALF微生物培养、mNGS检测对不同病原体的检出率,比较 BALF 微生物培养、mNGS 检测对 CAP/HAP 类型的检出率.结果 mNGS检测阳性检出率[86.42%(70/81)]高于BALF微生物培养[22.22%(18/81)],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);BALF微生物培养阳性18 例检出病原体 26 株,mNGS检测阳性 70 例检出病原体 148 株.BALF微生物培养、mNGS对不同病原体的检出率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);mNGS检测对单一型、混合型CAP/HAP的检出率均高于BALF微生物培养,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);70 例mNGS检测阳性样本序列数为(1 293.51±394.86)bp,高丰度占比84.29%(59/70),中丰度占比14.29%(10/70),低丰度占比 1.43%(1/70).mNGS检测病原体结果可信度较高.70 例mNGS检测阳性CAP/HAP患者检出148 株病原体,主要为细菌感染 56.76%(84/148),其中以革兰阴性菌为主.结论 mNGS检测诊断CAP/HAP的价值明显优于BALF微生物培养,能提高不同病原体种类、不同CAP/HAP类型的检出率,从而指导临床针对性进行抗微生物治疗.

Abstract

Objective To explore the diagnostic value and significance of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid(BALF)cul-ture and metagenomic next-generation sequencing(mNGS)detection in community-acquired pneumonia(CAP)/hospital-acquired pneumonia(HAP).Methods Eighty-one patients with CAP/HAP treated from October 2022 to April 2024 were selected.BALF was collected,and microbial culture and mNGS detection were performed.BALF microbial culture and mNGS pathogen detection results were recorded.The detection rates of BALF microbial culture and mNGS detection for different pathogens were compared,and the detection rates of BALF microbial culture and mNGS detection for CAP/HAP type were compared.Results The positive detection rate of mNGS[86.42%(70/81)]was higher than that of BALF microbial cul-ture[22.22%(18/81)],showing significant difference(P<0.05).Of 18 patients with positive BALF microbial culture,26 strains of pathogens were detected,and of 70 patients with positive mNGS detection,148 strains of pathogens were detec-ted.There was no significant difference in the detection rate of different pathogens between BALF microbial culture and mNGS detection(P>0.05).The detection rate of mNGS for both single and mixed CAP/HAP was higher than that of BALF micro-bial culture,with a statistically significant difference(P<0.05).The sequence number of 70 positive samples detected by mNGS was(1 293.51±394.86)bp,with a high abundance of 84.29%(59/70),a medium abundance of 14.29%(10/70),and a low abundance of 1.43%(1/70).The reliability of the results from mNGS in detecting pathogens was high.In 70 patients with positive mNGS detection of CAP/HAP,148 strains of pathogens were detected,mainly bacterial infections(56.76%,84/148),with Gram-negative bacteria being the predominant type(39.86%).Conclusion The value of mNGS detection in diagnosing CAP/HAP is significantly better than that of BALF microbial culture.It can improve the detection rate of different pathogen species and different types of CAP/HAP,thereby guiding targeted antimicrobial treatment in clinical practice.

关键词

社区获得性肺炎/医院获得性肺炎/支气管肺泡灌洗液/微生物培养/宏基因组学/病原体/革兰阴性菌

Key words

Community-acquired pneumonia/Hospital-acquired pneumonia/Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid/Microbial culture/Metagenomics/Pathogen/Gram-negative bacteria

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

广东省卫生健康委员会项目(B2021378)

出版年

2024
临床误诊误治
解放军白求恩国际和平医院

临床误诊误治

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.914
ISSN:1002-3429
段落导航相关论文