Comparison of clinical application effects between ultrasound-guided tunnel PICC venous catheterization and traditional PICC catheterization
Objective To compare the clinical application effects of ultrasound-guided tunnel peripherally inserted central venous catheters(PICC)venous catheterization and traditional PICC catheterization.Methods A total of 80 patients with PICC venous catheterization who were treated in hospital from May 2021 to April 2022 were selected as the research objects.The patients were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method,with 40 cases in each group.The control group underwent ultrasound-guided traditional PICC catheterization,and the observation group underwent ultrasound-guided tunnel PICC venous catheterization.The application effects of the two groups were compared.Results No grade Ⅲ and Ⅳ mechanical phlebitis occurred in the two groups after catheterization.The incidence of mechanical phlebitis after catheterization in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group,and the degree of bleeding at the puncture point was better than that in the control group(P<0.05).The success rate of one-time catheterization in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the incidence of catheter displacement,catheter prolapse and total incidence of complications were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).The comfort,self-care ability and aesthetic scores of the observation group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared with traditional PICC catheterization,the ultrasound-guided tunnel PICC venous catheterization has better application effect,which can significantly improve the success rate of one-time catheterization and better control the complications related to PICC catheterization.
tunnel peripherally inserted central venous catheterultrasound guidancecomplication
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
维普
