首页|髌上入路与髌下入路髓内钉固定治疗胫骨干骨折的临床效果比较

髌上入路与髌下入路髓内钉固定治疗胫骨干骨折的临床效果比较

扫码查看
目的 比较髌上入路与髌下入路髓内钉固定治疗胫骨干骨折的临床效果.方法 选择 2022 年 1月至2023年6月因胫骨干骨折于北京积水潭医院贵州医院骨外综合一科住院的 80 例患者作为研究对象,依据随机数字表法将其分为髌上组和髌下组,各40 例.髌上组采用髌上入路进行手术,髌下组采用髌下入路进行手术.比较两组的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、术中透视次数、术中二次移位情况、美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS)、改良Lysholm膝关节功能评分以及并发症发生情况.结果 髌上组的手术时间短于髌下组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).髌上组的术中透视次数、术中二次移位情况少于髌下组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后 3个月,两组的HSS、Lysholm评分均高于术前,且髌上组的Lysholm评分高于髌下组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).两组的术后并发症总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 与髌下入路相比,髌上入路髓内钉固定治疗胫骨干骨折在手术时间、术中透视次数、术中二次移位发生情况及膝关节功能恢复方面更具优势,推荐临床决策者优先考虑髌上入路髓内钉固定治疗胫骨干骨折.
Comparison of clinical effects of suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach for intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of tibial shaft fracture
Objective To compare the clinical effects of suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach for intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures.Methods A total of 80 patients with tibial shaft fracture hospitalized in the No.1 extraosseous comprehensive department of Guizhou Hospital of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2022 to June 2023 were selected as the research objects,and the patients were divided into suprapatellar group and infrapatellar group according to the random number table method,with 40 cases in each group.The suprapatellar group was operated by suprapatellar approach,and the infrapatellar group was operated by infrapatellar approach.The operation time,hospitalization time,intraoperative blood loss,intraoperative fluoroscopy times,intraoperative secondary displacement,Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score(HSS),modified Lysholm knee function score and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time of the suprapatellar group was shorter than that of the infrapatellar group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The intraoperative fluoroscopy times and intraoperative secondary displacement in the suprapatellar group were less than those in the infrapatellar group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).At 3 months after operation,the HSS and Lysholm scores of the two groups were higher than those before operation,the Lysholm score of the suprapatellar group was higher than that of the infrapatellar group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the total incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the infrapatellar approach,the suprapatellar approach intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of tibial shaft fracture has more advantages in operation time,intraoperative fluoroscopy times,intraoperative secondary displacement and knee joint function recovery.It is recommended that clinical decision makers give priority to the suprapatellar approach intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of tibial shaft fracture.

tibial shaft fractureintramedullary nailsuprapatellar approachinfrapatellar approach

熊先、董志军

展开 >

北京积水潭医院贵州医院,贵州 贵阳,550002

胫骨干骨折 髓内钉 髌上入路 髌下入路

2024

临床医学研究与实践

临床医学研究与实践

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.9(10)
  • 16