首页|不同剂量阿替普酶治疗急性轻型缺血性卒中患者的临床效果

不同剂量阿替普酶治疗急性轻型缺血性卒中患者的临床效果

扫码查看
目的 探讨不同剂量阿替普酶(rt-PA)静脉溶栓治疗急性轻型缺血性卒中(MIS)患者的有效性及安全性。方法 回顾性纳入 2018 年 10 月至 2021 年 12 月在柳州市人民医院接受小剂量rt-PA(0。6 mg/kg,总剂量≤60 mg)静脉溶栓治疗的 44 例急性MIS患者作为小剂量组,以同时期接受标准剂量rt-PA(0。9 mg/kg,总剂量≤90 mg)静脉溶栓治疗的62 例急性MIS患者作为标准剂量组。比较两组的治疗效果。结果 两组的临床资料无明显差异(P>0。05)。两组溶栓后7、90 d预后良好[改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分0~2 分]占比无明显差异(P>0。05)。两组的溶栓后颅内出血发生率无明显差异(P=0。397)。结论 rt-PA静脉溶栓治疗急性MIS患者是安全、有效的,但小剂量溶栓治疗方案可能更好。
Clinical effect of different doses of alteplase in the treatment of patients with acute mild ischemic stroke
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with different doses of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator(rt-PA)in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke(MIS).Methods Forty-four patients with acute MIS who received low-dose rt-PA(0.6 mg/kg,total dose≤60 mg)intravenous thrombolysis in Liuzhou People's Hospital from October 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively included as low-dose group,and 62 patients with acute MIS who received standard-dose rt-PA(0.9 mg/kg,total dose≤90 mg)intravenous thrombolysis at the same time were included as standard-dose group.The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared.Results There was no significant difference in clinical data between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the proportion of good prognosis[Modified Rankin Scale(mRS)score 0-2]between the two groups at 7 and 90 d after thrombolysis(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolysis between the two groups(P=0.397).Conclusion Intravenous thrombolysis therapy with rt-PA is safe and effective in patients with acute MIS,but low-dose thrombolysis therapy may be better.

mild ischemic strokealteplaseintravenous thrombolysis

黄光坚、韦韬、高文、覃惠洵、唐毅斯

展开 >

柳州市人民医院神经内科,广西 柳州,545006

轻型缺血性卒中 阿替普酶 静脉溶栓

广西壮族自治区卫生和计划生育委员会自筹经费科研课题

Z20180284

2024

临床医学研究与实践

临床医学研究与实践

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.9(25)