首页|不同剂量阿替普酶治疗急性轻型缺血性卒中患者的临床效果

不同剂量阿替普酶治疗急性轻型缺血性卒中患者的临床效果

Clinical effect of different doses of alteplase in the treatment of patients with acute mild ischemic stroke

扫码查看
目的 探讨不同剂量阿替普酶(rt-PA)静脉溶栓治疗急性轻型缺血性卒中(MIS)患者的有效性及安全性.方法 回顾性纳入 2018 年 10 月至 2021 年 12 月在柳州市人民医院接受小剂量rt-PA(0.6 mg/kg,总剂量≤60 mg)静脉溶栓治疗的 44 例急性MIS患者作为小剂量组,以同时期接受标准剂量rt-PA(0.9 mg/kg,总剂量≤90 mg)静脉溶栓治疗的62 例急性MIS患者作为标准剂量组.比较两组的治疗效果.结果 两组的临床资料无明显差异(P>0.05).两组溶栓后7、90 d预后良好[改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分0~2 分]占比无明显差异(P>0.05).两组的溶栓后颅内出血发生率无明显差异(P=0.397).结论 rt-PA静脉溶栓治疗急性MIS患者是安全、有效的,但小剂量溶栓治疗方案可能更好.
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with different doses of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator(rt-PA)in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke(MIS).Methods Forty-four patients with acute MIS who received low-dose rt-PA(0.6 mg/kg,total dose≤60 mg)intravenous thrombolysis in Liuzhou People's Hospital from October 2018 to December 2021 were retrospectively included as low-dose group,and 62 patients with acute MIS who received standard-dose rt-PA(0.9 mg/kg,total dose≤90 mg)intravenous thrombolysis at the same time were included as standard-dose group.The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared.Results There was no significant difference in clinical data between the two groups(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the proportion of good prognosis[Modified Rankin Scale(mRS)score 0-2]between the two groups at 7 and 90 d after thrombolysis(P>0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage after thrombolysis between the two groups(P=0.397).Conclusion Intravenous thrombolysis therapy with rt-PA is safe and effective in patients with acute MIS,but low-dose thrombolysis therapy may be better.

mild ischemic strokealteplaseintravenous thrombolysis

黄光坚、韦韬、高文、覃惠洵、唐毅斯

展开 >

柳州市人民医院神经内科,广西 柳州,545006

轻型缺血性卒中 阿替普酶 静脉溶栓

广西壮族自治区卫生和计划生育委员会自筹经费科研课题

Z20180284

2024

临床医学研究与实践

临床医学研究与实践

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.9(25)