从乾隆年间燕行录看朝鲜燕行使对毛奇龄的接受
On Korean Envoys'Acceptance of Mao Qiling from the Yanxinglu During the Reign of Emperor Qianlong
罗静1
作者信息
摘要
毛奇龄在明末清初学风嬗变过程中有重要作用,嘉庆以后被阮元等推崇,作为"汉学开山"的学术形象逐渐建立.但乾隆时,中国学界中毛奇龄经学之批评者占绝对优势,毛氏因"驳朱"多被视为"经学之蠹",仅有少数人认同其学识渊博及考证学之贡献.乾隆中后期,受到中国学界毛氏"反朱子"学术形象固化的影响,朝鲜燕行使对毛氏"反宋学""反朱子"多持否定态度.朝鲜燕行使或认为毛氏"反朱子"源于对明朝的思念,或通过对毛氏之批评获得对清朝的优越感,这既体现了朝鲜使者对文化主体性的追求,又暗含了其在明清文化秩序选择中的矛盾心态.毛氏学术形象被中朝学者不断重构的过程正是东亚学术思想演进的过程.
Abstract
Mao Qiling is now well reorganized for his role in the transition of academic paradigm in the late Ming and early Qing Dynasties.After the Jiaqing period,highly praised by Ruan Yuan,et al.Mao Qiling's academic image as the"pioneer of Han Xue"was gradually established.However,in the Qianlong period,only few appreciated his profound knowledge and contribution to the study of evidence.Mauled as a"pest of the Classic"for his criticism against Zhu Xi,the image of Mao Qiling of that time remained overwhelmingly negative among the academic community.In the middle and late Qianlong period,influenced by the solidification of the academic image of Mao Qiling's"anti-Zhu Zi"in the Chinese academy,the Korean emissaries held a negative attitude towards Mao Qiling's"anti-Song studies"and"anti-Zhu Zi"concepts.The Korean envoys either believed that Mao Qiling's"anti-Zhu Zi"stemmed from his nostalgia for the Ming Dynasty,or that they gained a sense of superiority over the Qing Dynasty through their criticism of Mao Qiling.This not only reflects the Korean envoys'pursuit of cultural subjectivity,but also implies their contradictory mentality in the selection of cultural order between the Ming and Qing Dynasties.The continuous re-construction of Mao Qiling's academic image among Chinese and Korean scholars is the result of the evolution of academic thought in East Asia.
关键词
毛奇龄/燕行录/汉学/朝鲜燕行使/东亚学术Key words
Mao Qiling/Yanxinglu/Han Xue/Korean Envoys/Academic Thought in East Asia引用本文复制引用
基金项目
国家社会科学重大基金项目(15ZDB071)
国家社会科学基金青年项目(20CZW028)
北京外国语大学世界亚洲研究信息中心资助项目(244090400006)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据