首页|王船山道论与《老子衍》解读

王船山道论与《老子衍》解读

扫码查看
一般认为王船山对《老子》是批评与贬低的态度,其著《老子衍》也被解读为反讽立场,实际上船山道论亦吸纳了《老子》的观点,并作出气学视角的新诠释.一方面,解读《老子衍》需要以船山《周易外传》等著述为参考系;另一方面,《老子衍》中的命题论证亦是船山道论体系的组成部分.在《老子衍》晦涩的注释之中,虽然船山没有严格遵循注疏体例对老子原文亦步亦趋,但认为《老子衍》是通篇暗讽也不免失却其本意.船山试图消解老子学说流于功利的面向,同时对老子道论有所去取和转化,彰显道体本动、道无偏倚的特性.
Wang Chuanshan's Ontology System and the Interpretation of Laoziyan
It is generally believed that Wang Fuzhi's attitude towards Lao Tzu is critical and depreciative,and his book Laoziyan has also been interpreted as irony.In fact,Wang Fuzhi's ontology system also incorporates the classic views of Lao Tzu and he makes a new interpretation of the perspective of Qi studies.On the one hand,the interpretation of Laoziyan requires Chuan-shan's Zhouyi Waizhuan as a reference frame.On the other hand,the inter-pretation in Laoziyan also makes up an important part of Chuanshan's ontolo-gy system.In the obscure annotations of Laoziyan,Chuanshan does not strict-ly obey the original text of Lao Tzu,but treats Laoziyan as a full text of irony which would inevitably lose the purpose of Chuanshan.Chuanshan tries to dissolve the utilitarian aspect of Lao Tzu's doctrine and to trans-form Lao Tzu's theory,and this rejection also reflects the evolution of Lao Tzu's commentary trend in the late Ming Dynasty,highlighting the inherent characteristics of Dao as dynamic and impartial.

LaoziyanZhouyi WaizhuanDao Guan Ti YongDao Zai Wu Zhong

李天新

展开 >

复旦大学哲学学院

老子衍 周易外传 道贯体用 道在物中

国家社科基金青年项目

23CZX065

2024

理论界
辽宁省社会科学界联合会

理论界

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.217
ISSN:1003-6547
年,卷(期):2024.(1)
  • 3