首页|对西方整体主义环境伦理学论证逻辑的再审视——兼与裴士军、徐朝旭老师商榷

对西方整体主义环境伦理学论证逻辑的再审视——兼与裴士军、徐朝旭老师商榷

扫码查看
在本体论层面,西方整体主义环境伦理学的代表人物克里考特和罗尔斯顿对自然内在价值的论证逻辑是不同的.但在认识论和实践论层面,二者都注重情感的作用,遵循了"情感→价值→义务"的论证逻辑.然而,情感具有主观性,难免导致道德相对主义问题.为此,我们要将人理解为一个有机的生命整体,避免将人视为单向度的理性存在或单向度的情感存在.既要促进人类科学理性不断进步,又要加强人与自然的情感联系,高扬人的道德理性,在实现人的内在价值的同时,实现自然的内在价值.
Further Reflection on the Argumentation Logics of Western Holistic Environmental Ethics——A Discussion with Mr.Pei Shijun and Mr.Xu Zhaoxu
At the ontological level,the representative figures of western holistic environmental ethics,J.B.Callicott and Holmes Rolston,have different argu-mentation logics for the intrinsic value of nature.However,at the epistemologi-cal and practical levels,both of them focus on the role of sympathy and follow the argumentation logic of"sympathy→value→obligation".But the subjectivi-ty of sympathy inevitably leads to the problem of moral relativism.Therefore,we should understand human beings as an organic whole of life and avoid treating them as one-dimensional rational or emotional existences.It is neces-sary to promote continuous progress in human scientific rationality while also strengthening the emotional connection between human beings and nature and exalting human moral rationality.By realizing the intrinsic value of human be-ings,we can also realize the intrinsic value of nature.

argumentation logicthe intrinsic value of natureJ.B.CallicottHolm-es Rolstonsympathy

李秀艳

展开 >

天津师范大学马克思主义学院

论证逻辑 自然的内在价值 克里考特 罗尔斯顿 情感

2024

理论界
辽宁省社会科学界联合会

理论界

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.217
ISSN:1003-6547
年,卷(期):2024.(12)