数据出境安全审查管辖权冲突及国际应对
The Jurisdiction Conflict of the Data Exit Security Review and the International Response
孙丹1
作者信息
- 1. 辽宁大学法学院,辽宁沈阳 110036
- 折叠
摘要
随着美国《云法案》和欧盟《通用数据保护条例》的生效执行,多重管辖权冲突几乎不可避免.在数据出境安全审查的过程中因为各国法律规定的不同,导致出现禁止出境、限制出境的情况.与此同时,数据强国正在通过自己的法律,对域外主权国家的数据出境安全审查施加影响,甚至是要求数据主权国家主动提供数据,由此也引发管辖权冲突.国际社会应对数据出境安全审查中出现的管辖权冲突,主要体现为美国开始从构建双边规则向多边规则转型,欧盟通过数据保护白名单制度等建立数据出境安全审查的国际模式,印度向美国建立的数据出境安全审查体系融入,俄罗斯确立了内外同严数据出境安全审查宗旨,为各国应对数据出境安全审查的管辖权冲突提供了积极的借鉴作用.
Abstract
With the implementation of the US Cloud Act and the EU's General Data Protection Regulation,multiple jurisdiction conflicts are almost inevitable.In the process of data exit security review,there are different laws and regulations in different countries,resulting in the situation of prohibiting and restricting data exit.At the same time,data powers are exerting influence on the security review of data exit by other sovereign states through the extraterritorial application of their own laws,and even requiring other data sovereign states to voluntarily provide data,triggering jurisdiction conflicts.In order to cope with the jurisdiction conflicts in data exit security review,the international community mainly manifests that the United States has begun to transform from building bilateral rules to multilateral rules,the European Union has established an international model of data exit security review through the data protection whitelist system,India has integrated into the data exit security review system established by the United States,and Russia has established the purpose of both internal and external strict data exit security review.The above measures have provided a positive reference for countries to deal with the jurisdiction conflict of data exit security review.
关键词
数据出境安全审查/管辖权冲突/数据主权/国际应对Key words
Data exit security review/jurisdiction conflict/data sovereignty/international response引用本文复制引用
出版年
2023
NETL
NSTL
维普
万方数据