岭南心血管病杂志2024,Vol.30Issue(6) :615-619.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9688.2024.06.09

床旁即时超声在急诊重症监护病房围复苏期患者中的临床应用

Clinical Application of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Patients during Periresus-citative Period in Emergency Intensive Care Unite

张朝辉 孟超群 刘敏
岭南心血管病杂志2024,Vol.30Issue(6) :615-619.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9688.2024.06.09

床旁即时超声在急诊重症监护病房围复苏期患者中的临床应用

Clinical Application of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Patients during Periresus-citative Period in Emergency Intensive Care Unite

张朝辉 1孟超群 1刘敏1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 三峡大学附属中心人民医院&宜昌市中心人民医院重症医学科,湖北 宜昌 443003
  • 折叠

摘要

目的 探讨床旁即时超声指导下围复苏期患者的救治效果.方法 收集宜昌市中心人民医院急诊重症监护病房2020年1月至2022年10月收治的围复苏期患者309例,采用非随机对照研究,分为超声组和对照组.两组患者均给予常规集束化治疗,其中在复苏中使用超声的患者173例,未使用超声的患者136例,比较两组患者的一般资料及临床观察指标.结果 超声组患者的首次复苏成功率、正确诊断率、脑复苏成功率及28 d存活率均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义[76.7%vs.60.3%、84.7%vs.72.1%、74.6%vs.58.8%、65.9%vs.40.4%,P<0.05].超声组患者的正确诊断时间及机械通气时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义[(14.76±1.89)min vs.(36.20±4.75)min、(97.5±22.10)h vs.(155.93±19.71)h,P<0.05].超声组患者转出重症监护病房时的APACHE Ⅱ评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义[(14.85±2.46)分 vs.(22.50±2.62)分,P<0.05].虽然超声组患者评估用时长于对照组[(7.76±3.65)s vs.(7.43±0.53)s],复苏时间短于对照组[(16.42±7.15)s vs.(18.04±4.20)s],病因明确率高于对照组[90.8%vs.87.5%],癫痫发生率低于对照组[12.7%vs.19.1%],但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 床旁即时超声的使用能对围复苏期患者进行快速筛查,早期排查病因,使患者得到及时准确的治疗,缩短机械通气时间,减少住院时间,降低住院费用,提高存活率,改善预后.

Abstract

Objectives To explore the efficacy of point of care ultrasound in the treatment of patients during periresusci-tative period.Methods A total of 309 patients in the periresuscitative period admitted to the emergency intensive care unite(ICU)of Yichang Central People's Hospital from January 2020 to October 2022 were collected by a non-randomized controlled study,including 173 patients who used ultrasound during resuscitation and not in 136 patients.Both groups were given conventional bundle therapy.The general information and clinical observation indicators of the two groups were collected and compared.Results Compared to non-ultrasound group,the success rate of resuscitation for the first time,success rate of cerebral resuscitation,28-day survival rate and correct diagnosis rate were higher in ultrasound group[76.7%vs.60.3%,84.7%vs.72.1%,74.6%vs.58.8%,65.9%vs.40.4%],with statistical significance(P<0.05).The correct diagnosis duration and mechanical ventilation duration in ultrasound group were shorter than those in non-ultrasound group[(14.76±1.89)min vs.(36.20±4.75)min,(97.5±22.10)h vs.(155.93±19.71)h],and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The APACHE-Ⅱscore at ICU discharge of ultrasound group was lower than that of non-ultrasound group[(14.85±2.46)scores vs.(22.50±2.62)scores],and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Although the evaluation duration of ultrasound group were longer than those of control group[(7.76±3.65)s vs.(7.43±0.53)s],the resuscitation duration of ultrasound group were shorter than those of non-ultrasound group[(16.42±7.15)s vs.(18.04±4.20)s],the etiological diagnosis rate was higher than that of non-ultrasound group[90.8%vs.87.5%],and the incidence of epilepsy was lower than that of non-ultrasound group[12.7%vs.19.1%],the differences were not statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusions The use of point-of-care ultrasound can rapidly screen patients in the periresuscitative period,early detect the cause of disease,so that patients can get timely and accurate treatment,shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation,reduce the length of hospital stay,reduce hospitalization expenses,improve survival rate and prognosis.

关键词

床旁即时超声/围复苏期/重症监护病房

Key words

point of care ultrasound/periresuscitative period/intensive care unite

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
岭南心血管病杂志
广东省心血管病研究所

岭南心血管病杂志

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.872
ISSN:1007-9688
段落导航相关论文