首页|楼房仓包装粮硫酰氟与磷化铝局部熏蒸差异试验

楼房仓包装粮硫酰氟与磷化铝局部熏蒸差异试验

扫码查看
粮堆内局部出现储粮害虫,在粮情可控情况下,一般采取磷化氢或硫酰氟局部熏蒸处理.为了对比试剂熏蒸效果,分别采用硫酰氟(005 仓)、磷化铝(008 仓)进行局部熏蒸试验.结果表明:005 仓与 008仓试验部位均未发现储粮害虫,也未出现黄粒米.熏蒸处理半年后,005仓杀虫效果更明显,黄粒米含量更低,脂肪酸值上升缓慢.对于局部熏蒸杀虫,硫酰氟熏蒸操作过程相对简单,对储粮品质影响比较小,对延缓粮食品质下降有一定效果,但处理成本更高.若是整仓发现储粮害虫,从节约成本费用方面考虑,应整仓密闭采用磷化铝熏蒸或气调储粮法.
Comparative test of sulfuryl fluoride and aluminum phosphide local fumigation in packaged grains from building warehouse
The local emergence of grain storage pests in the grain pile,in the case of controllable grain conditions,generally take phosphine or sulfuryl fluoride local fumigation treatment.In order to compare the fumigation effect of reagents,this test 005 warehouse using sulfuryl fluoride,008 warehouse using aluminium phosphide were used to carry out local fumigation difference test.The test results after fumigation showed that no grain pests were found in the test site of 005 and 008 silos,and no yellow grain rice was found.After half a year of fumigation treatment,the test results showed that:the insecticidal effect of warehouse 005 was more obvious,the content of yellow grain rice was lower,and the fatty acid value increased slowly.For local fumigation to kill pests,sulfuryl fluoride fumiga-tion operation process is relatively simple,the impact on the quality of stored grain is relatively small,and there is a certain effect on delaying the aging,but the treatment cost is higher.If stored grain pests are found in the whole silo,the whole silo should be closed and fumigated with aluminium phosphide or air-conditioned grain storage method from the aspect of cost-saving consideration.

sulfuryl fluoridephosphinelocal fumigationbuilding warehousepackaged grains

谢周得、吴文强、刘玲、林永健、庄芸蕾、吴远、黄怀炜

展开 >

中央储备粮三明直属库有限公司,福建 三明 353000

全国粮食行业技能拔尖人才工作室,福建 三明 353000

中储粮江苏质检中心有限公司福建分公司,福建 福州 350008

硫酰氟 磷化氢 局部熏蒸 楼房仓 包装粮

2024

粮食科技与经济
湖南省粮食经济科技学会 中诸粮管理总公司湖南分公司

粮食科技与经济

影响因子:0.505
ISSN:1007-1458
年,卷(期):2024.49(5)