乐山师范学院学报2024,Vol.39Issue(10) :47-54,85.DOI:10.16069/j.cnki.51-1610/g4.2024.10.007

《碧云騢》为梅尧臣作定谳

Confirming Mei Yaochen as the Author of Biyunxia

唐春燕
乐山师范学院学报2024,Vol.39Issue(10) :47-54,85.DOI:10.16069/j.cnki.51-1610/g4.2024.10.007

《碧云騢》为梅尧臣作定谳

Confirming Mei Yaochen as the Author of Biyunxia

唐春燕1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 西南民族大学中国语言文学学院,四川成都 610000
  • 折叠

摘要

从书目文献来看,认定《碧云騢》乃魏泰伪托的目录学家代不乏人,但其论据缺乏说服力.唯晁公武从梅尧臣后人口中得知此书确系其作的证据较为可靠.梅尧臣的思想和《碧云騢》所体现的思想并不矛盾,其和范仲淹先交好,后因未得对方提携,及其诸好友因庆历新政失败遭贬而对范仲淹逐渐产生怨怼之心.又梅尧臣《书窜》《宣麻》等诗对文彦博事的记载,及对其态度与《碧云騢》相类.从魏泰《东轩笔记》来看,其对梅尧臣及《碧云騢》所涉诸人并无非议,找不到其伪作动机.基于以上三点,梅尧臣为《碧云騢》之作者,此一论断确定无疑.

Abstract

From the bibliographic documents,there are many bibliographers who believe that Biyunxia is a fake work of Wei Tai,but their arguments are not convincing.The evidence Chao Gongwu learned from Mei Yaochen's descendants that this book was indeed Mei Yaochen's work is reliable.There is no contradiction between Mei Yaochen's thoughts and those embodied in Biyunxia.Initially,Mei Yaochen was on good terms with Fan Zhongyan,but later,due to not being promoted by the latter and seeing his friends demoted after the failure of the Qingli New Policies,he gradually developed resentment towards Fan Zhongyan.Furthermore,Mei Yaochen's poems Shu Chuan and Xuan Ma contain records of Wen Yanbo's affairs,and his attitude towards Wen is similar to that depicted in Bi Yun Xia.From the perspective of Wei Tai's Dongxuanbiji,there is no criticism of Mei Yaochen and the people involved in Biyunxia,and we cannot find Wei Tai's motive for forgery.Based on the above,there is no doubt that Mei Yaochen is the author of Biyunxia.

关键词

《碧云騢》/署名作者/辨伪方法/梅尧臣

Key words

Biyunxia/attributed author/methods of discerning authenticity/Mei Yaochen

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
乐山师范学院学报
乐山师范学院

乐山师范学院学报

影响因子:0.205
ISSN:1009-8666
段落导航相关论文