首页|神圣人与异化人:主体角度下阿甘本和马克思的批判路径

神圣人与异化人:主体角度下阿甘本和马克思的批判路径

扫码查看
20世纪晚期兴起的生命政治学为当代资本批判开辟了一条新路,其与马克思政治经济学的理论对话引起了学界的广泛关注.在探索资本体系下个体生存境况的批判理论框架中,主体问题已成为联结生命政治学与政治经济学的核心议题.具体而言,阿甘本的"神圣人"与马克思的"异化人"在生存状态、产生机制等方面存在多种相似之处,但二者在讨论生命性质上的相互对立显示了生命政治学与政治经济学在理论维度方面的根本分歧,尽管如此,阿甘本对"神圣人"的深刻探讨也的确切中了当代资本体系下的民主乱象,并引导我们重新审视数字时代下主体的实际境遇.
Homo Sacer and Alienated Man:Critique Paths of Agenben and Marx from the Perspective of Subjectivity
The emergence of biopolitics in recent decades has opened up a new path for contemporary critiques of capitalism,sparking considerable academic interest in its theoretical dialogue with Marx's political economy.Within the critical theoretical framework exploring individual survival conditions under the capitalist system,the issue of subjectivity has become a central theme linking biopolitics and political economy.Specifically,Agamben's"Homo Sacer"and Marx's"Alienated Man"exhibit various similarities in terms of their conditions of existence and mechanisms of production.However,their fundamental opposition in terms of the nature of life reveals the essential divergence between biopolitics and political economy on the theoretical level,leading to the"Homo Sacer"ultimately keeping away from reality and moving towards theoretical community.Nevertheless,Agamben's profound exploration of the"Homo Sacer"strikes a chord with the democratic chaos under the contemporary capitalist system,guiding us to reexamine the actual plight of subjects in the digital age.

SubjectivityHomo SacerAlienated ManMarxAgenben

王星儿、王海龙

展开 >

华中师范大学

华中师范大学文学院

主体 神圣人 异化人 马克思 阿甘本

2024

马克思主义哲学研究

马克思主义哲学研究

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.34(2)