首页|提供"VPN"服务行为的司法规制

提供"VPN"服务行为的司法规制

扫码查看
作为网络链接和数据传输的媒介与工具,端赖互联网的VPN服务日渐成为实现网络犯罪的重要一环.囿于刑事立法对VPN服务针对性规范的缺位,刑法应着眼于提供VPN服务行为司法层面的规制.首先,VPN服务于前置规范定性实属增值业务范畴,具有市场准入资格和经营门槛的双重限制;其次,刑事司法涵摄提供 VPN服务行为须坚守罪刑法定基本原则和刑法的谦抑性理念;再者,应以"联结性"程度的不同作为逻辑依据,将该行为区分为相对独立性的"本体行为"和相对依附性的"帮助行为";最后,在判别行为模式基础之上,对前者适用非法经营罪而辅之以补充性要件加以限缩,后者在具体区分从属性帮助行为、中立性帮助行为类型下分别适用提供程序工具罪和拒不履行信息网络安全管理义务罪.
The Judicial Regulation of Providing"VPN"Service
As a medium and tool for network link and data transmission,VPN services that rely on the internet are increasingly becoming an important part of the realization of cybercrime.Due to the lack of targeted regulation of VPN services in criminal legislation,criminal law should focus on the judicial regulation of VPN service provision.First of all,VPN services are value-added services in the pre-normative category,with double restrictions on market access qualifications and business thresholds.Secondly,the act of providing VPN services in criminal justice must adhere to the basic principle of statutory punishment and the concept of modesty in criminal law.Furthermore,the behavior should be divided into"ontological behavior,"which is relatively independent,and"helping behavior,"which is relatively dependent based on the different degrees of"connectedness"as a logical basis.Finally,based on discriminating behavior patterns,the former is applicable to the crime of illegal operation,and the supplementary elements are supplemented to limit it.The latter is applicable to the crime of providing program tools and the crime of refusing to perform the information network security management obligation under the specific distinction between the accessory help behavior and the neutral help behavior.

VPNwall-climbing serviceneutral assisting behaviorjoint crimejudicial regulation

刘浩、王正阳

展开 >

清华大学法学院 北京 100084

上海市第二中级人民法院申诉审监庭 上海 200070

VPN 翻墙服务 中立帮助行为 共同犯罪 司法规制

河南省法学会项目

HNLS2023A30

2024

西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
西南科技大学

西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.274
ISSN:1672-4860
年,卷(期):2024.41(2)
  • 39