塞尚与科学透视法的终结:梅洛-庞蒂与诺沃特尼的异同
Cézanne and the End of Scientific Perspective:The Similarities and Differences Between Merleau-Ponty and Novotny
卫俊1
作者信息
- 1. 法国里昂第三大学哲学系,法国里昂69008
- 折叠
摘要
奥地利艺术史家诺沃特尼的塞尚研究影响了众多学者,其中包括从现象学和存在论角度阐发塞尚的法国哲学家梅洛-庞蒂.梅氏虽然援引了诺沃特尼的研究,但二者的观点实际上有很多不同.通过分析诺沃特尼对塞尚的定位,特别是所谓塞尚走了一条"中间道路"的说法,以及梅氏对诺沃特尼观点的援引和再解释,尤其是对塞尚绘画的"非人类"特征以及"色彩调节"两个问题的聚焦,结合二者对科学透视法本身的不同理解,可以看出梅氏与诺沃特尼间的相似与差异:虽然梅氏赞同诺沃特尼所说的塞尚远离科学透视法后,其绘画呈现出非人类特征,并且强调色彩调节,但他并不认为塞尚走向了再现与平面之间的中间道路,而是强调他走向了另一种知觉的真实.
Abstract
The Austrian art historian Novotny's research on Cézanne has influenced numerous scholars,including the French philosopher Merleau-Ponty,who elucidated Cézanne from the perspectives of phenomenology and ontology.Although Mer-leau-Ponty's study is inspired by Novotny's research,there are actually many differences between their views.By analyzing Novotny's positioning of Cézanne,especially the so-called"middle path"that Cézanne took,as well as Merleau-Ponty's quotation and reinterpretation of Novotny's views,especially his focus on the"non-human"features and"color modulation"of Cézanne's paintings,and with the combination of the different understandings of scientific perspectives by the two schol-ars,we can see the similarities and differences between Merleau-Ponty and Novotny:although Merleau-Ponty agrees with Novotny that Cézanne's paintings exhibit non-human features and emphasize color modulation after moving away from scien-tific perspective,he does not believe that Cézanne moves towards the middle path between representation and flatness,but rather emphasizes his move towards another kind of perceptual truth.
关键词
塞尚/透视法/诺沃特尼/梅洛-庞蒂/知觉Key words
Cézanne/perspective method/Novotny/Merleau-Ponty/perception引用本文复制引用
基金项目
教育部国家留学基金委(CSC)国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目(202006010106)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据