首页|"汉学"与"艺术史"的融合何以可能:试论20世纪以来欧美"新艺术汉学"的形成与发展

"汉学"与"艺术史"的融合何以可能:试论20世纪以来欧美"新艺术汉学"的形成与发展

扫码查看
在20世纪40年代"是汉学还是艺术史"的大讨论之后,欧美汉学界针对"中国艺术"的研究出现了不同于"艺术汉学"收藏品鉴阶段的三个特征:一是"汉学家"和"艺术史家"逐渐实现身份合流,形成了颇具规模的学者群;二是传统汉学的考据方法和艺术史的风格分析法在论证中互为补充;三是在译介更多艺术理论文献的基础上,作为研究对象的"中国艺术"有了更明确的规定性,也寻回了在"艺术汉学"阶段被遮蔽的研究疆域。20世纪中叶,"新艺术汉学"应势而生,集中表现在学科意识的自觉和多元的学科形态上。20世纪80年代以来,欧美汉学界更新了"范式",以跨文化和跨学科为表征的"新艺术汉学"进入了元学科甚至后学科的阶段。
How the Integration of"Sinology"and"Art History"is Possible:An Experimental Discussion on the Formation and Development of"New Art Sinology"in Europe and the United States since the 20th Century
After the great discussion of"sinology or art history"in the 1940s,three characteristics of the study of Chinese art in Europe and the United States appeared different from that of the"art sinology"col-lection.The first is the gradual merging of the identities of"sinologists"and"art historians,"forming a siz-able group of scholars;the second is the complementarity of the traditional sinological method of evidence and the art historical method of stylistic analysis in the argumentation;and the third is that,based on the translation and introduction of more theoretical literature on art,"Chinese art"as the object of study became more clearly defined,and the research boundaries that had been obscured during the phase of"art Sinology"were also recovered.In the middle of the 20th century,"new art sinology",characterized by intercultural-ism and interdisciplinarity,has entered the stage of being a meta-discipline or even post-discipline.

sinologyart historyart sinologyparadigm

陈忆澄

展开 >

中国传媒大学艺术研究院 北京 100024

汉学 艺术史 艺术汉学 范式

2024

民族艺术研究
云南省民族艺术研究院

民族艺术研究

CSSCICHSSCD
影响因子:0.379
ISSN:1003-840X
年,卷(期):2024.37(6)