南方水产科学2024,Vol.20Issue(1) :173-183.DOI:10.12131/20230159

两种养殖蛙类肌肉品质、肠道形态学及微生物构成比较分析

Comparative analysis of muscle quality,intestinal morphology and micro-bial composition in two cultured frogs species

王志龙 夏耘 谢骏 舒锐 王广军 郁二蒙 雷小婷 龚望宝
南方水产科学2024,Vol.20Issue(1) :173-183.DOI:10.12131/20230159

两种养殖蛙类肌肉品质、肠道形态学及微生物构成比较分析

Comparative analysis of muscle quality,intestinal morphology and micro-bial composition in two cultured frogs species

王志龙 1夏耘 2谢骏 2舒锐 3王广军 2郁二蒙 2雷小婷 3龚望宝2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 水产科学国家级实验教学示范中心(上海海洋大学),上海 201306;中国水产科学研究院珠江水产研究所/农业农村部热带亚热带水产资源利用与养殖重点实验室,广东广州 510380
  • 2. 中国水产科学研究院珠江水产研究所/农业农村部热带亚热带水产资源利用与养殖重点实验室,广东广州 510380
  • 3. 广东省星蛙农业科技有限公司,广东肇庆 526070
  • 折叠

摘要

为分析泰国虎纹蛙(Hoplobatrachus tigerinus)和牛蛙(Lithobates catesbeiana)的肌肉品质、肠道形态及微生物构成,采用食品安全国家标准测定方法对这两种养殖蛙的肌肉营养成分进行监测,结合肌肉质构和显微结构的分析对两者肌肉品质进行评价,同时利用高通量测序和组织学切片技术对两者肠道微生物群落构成和显微结构进行分析.结果显示,泰国虎纹蛙和牛蛙氨基酸总量差异不显著(P>0.05);牛蛙的不饱和脂肪酸含量显著高于泰国虎纹蛙(P<0.05).此外,牛蛙肌肉的硬度、咀嚼性和胶黏性均显著高于泰国虎纹蛙(P<0.05).肠道微生物分析显示,泰国虎纹蛙的Shannon、Ace和Chao1指数均显著高于牛蛙(P<0.05);门水平上,牛蛙的厚壁菌门丰度显著高于泰国虎纹蛙(P<0.05),而放线菌门丰度显著低于后者(P<0.05);属水平上,泰国虎纹蛙的乳球菌属(Lactococcus)和埃希杆菌-志贺菌属(Escherichia-Shigella)丰度显著高于牛蛙(P<0.05),而乳杆菌属(Lactobacillus)和明串珠菌属(Leuconostoc)丰度显著低于后者(P<0.05).研究表明,泰国虎纹蛙和牛蛙肌肉品质存在差异,但营养价值均较高;高通量测序分析显示两者肠道微生物群落组成存在差异.

Abstract

In order to investigate the muscle quality,intestinal morphology and microbial composition of Hoplobatrachus tigeri-nus and Lithobates catesbeiana,we monitored the muscle nutritional components of two cultured frogs species by national food safety standard measurement method,and evaluated their muscle quality in addition with analysis of muscle texture and micro-structure.Besides,we applied high-throughput sequencing and histological section technology to analyze the microbial com-munitycompositionandmicrostructureoftheirgut.Theresultsshowthattherewasnosignificantdifferenceinthetotalaminoacidsbetween H.tigerinus and L.catesbeiana(P>0.05).The unsaturated fatty acids content of L.catesbeiana were significantly higher than those of H.tigerinus(P<0.05).In addition,the muscle hardness,chewiness and gumminess of L.catesbeiana were significantly higher than those of H.tigerinus(P<0.05).The analyses of intestinal microbial communities show that the Shannon,Ace and Chaol indexes of H.tigerinus were significantly higher than those of L.catesbeiana(P<0.05).At phylum level,the abundance of Firmicutes in L.catesbeiana was significantly higher than that in H.tigerinus(P<0.05),while the abundance of Actinobacteriota was significantly lower(P<0.05);At genus level,the abundance of Lactococcus and Escherichia-Shigella in H.tigerinus was signi-ficantly higher than that in L.catesbeiana(P<0.05),while Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc were significantly lower(P<0.05).The results show that there are differences in muscle quality between H.tigerinus and L.catesbeiana,but both have high nutritional value;high-throughput sequencing analyses show that there are differences in the composition of intestinal microbial com-munities between the two species.

关键词

泰国虎纹蛙/牛蛙/营养评价/质构特性/肠道微生物

Key words

Hoplobatrachus tigerinus/Lithobates catesbeiana/Nutrition evaluation/Texture property/Intestinal microbiota

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

农业部购买服务项目(A160603)

出版年

2024
南方水产科学
中国水产科学研究院南海水产研究所

南方水产科学

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.591
ISSN:2095-0780
参考文献量47
段落导航相关论文