The determination of liability in road traffic accident identification significantly impacts the assessment of whether the parties are liable for a traffic accident crime,should be subject to administrative penalties,or are obligated to provide civil compensation and its specific amount.Presently,due to legal constraints categorizing road traffic accident confirmation as"evidence,"if dissatisfied with the determination,only the higher-level public security traffic management department can request a review.The court is restricted to evaluating its evidentiary impact based on evidence rules.However,in practice,judicial adjudication heavily relies on factual statements and responsibility assessments in the road traffic accident confirmation process.As this process does not fully align with characteristics of evidence,there exist significant limitations within applicable evidence rules that result in restricted judicial relief provided by courts-this is detrimental to safeguarding the rights and interests of all involved parties.Therefore,it is imperative to accurately comprehend the nature of road traffic accident identification as an administrative confirmation procedure.Based on this understanding,a comprehensive and multi-tier independent relief mechanism involving internal review,administrative reconsideration,and administrative litigation within public security should be established to uphold fairness and justice.