摘要
个人信息保护监管机构的选择与个人信息保护目标相关.专门监管机构模式倾向于对.个人信息权益采取侧重保护的立场,并强调发挥政府监管的作用.多部门分散监管模式则试图寻求信息权益保护与产业创新发展的平衡,并强调发挥行业自律机制的作用.不同的监管模式都具有其优点,同时也存在实施上的困境,应当在综合衡量个人信息保护目标、立法模式、执法传统、行业自律水平等要素的基础上进行设置.结合我国的个人信息保护目标与监管机构的实际情况,现行法所选择的是以多部门分散监管为基础、国家网信部门统筹协调的混合式监管机构方案.该方案具有其合理性,但仍可能存在缺乏协调性、专业性、客观性等问题.因此,需要结合现行法规定,通过明确内部与外部信息交流与意见反馈机制、明确监管部门的协调义务与配合请求权、明确执法资质与专家咨询等专业性提升制度来予以完善.
Abstract
The selection of regulatory agency is relative to the objectives of personal information protec-tion.The specialized regulatory agency model emphasizes the importance of personal informa-tion rights and the role of government regulation,while the decentralized regulatory model,at-tempting to seek a balance between information rights protection and industrial innovation devel-opment,emphasizes the role of industry self-regulatory mechanisms.With their own advanta-ges,both models face implementation challenges,and should be established based on a com-prehensive evaluation of personal information protection goals,legislative model,enforcement tradition,industry self-regulatory level,and other factors.With a consideration of the goals of China's personal information protection and the actual situation of regulatory agencies,the cur-rent law has chosen a hybrid regulatory agency scheme based on multi departmental decentral-ized regulation and coordinated by the Cyberspace Administration of China.This has certain ra-tionality,but may still lead to such issues as lack of coordination,professionalism and objectiv-ity.Therefore,it is necessary to improve the scheme through strengthening the corresponding mechanism for information exchange and feedback,clarifying the coordination obligation and request right,and setting up a sound system of law enforcement qualifications and expert con-sultation.
万方数据