首页|从异化劳动批判到反劳动的文化想象——评马尔库塞对马克思劳动概念的激进解读

从异化劳动批判到反劳动的文化想象——评马尔库塞对马克思劳动概念的激进解读

扫码查看
在20世纪的西方马克思主义者中,马尔库塞对马克思异化劳动理论的解读最为激进,其核心论点是重视马克思早期的《1844年经济学哲学手稿》而贬抑其后期的《资本论》,并最终使反资本主义从马克思所规划的一项现实运动过程倒退为某种纯粹的乌托邦想象.马尔库塞对马克思异化劳动理论的解读无疑严重曲解了马克思的本意,但他对马克思劳动概念的持续反思却是马克思哲学在当代资本主义条件下的一种理论效应.在国内哲学界对马克思异化劳动理论研究相对沉寂的今天,就马尔库塞的解读作出必要的回应和辩驳,将有助于我们坚守马克思主义的立场,把马克思哲学理解为一以贯之的有机整体.
From the Criticism of Alienated Labor to the Cultural Imagination of Anti-labor:Marcuse's Radical Interpretation of Marx's Concept of Labor
Among Western Marxists in the 20th century,Marcuse's interpretation of Marx's theory of alienated la-bor was the most radical.His central argument emphasizes Marx's early Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 while disparaging his later Capital,ultimately regressing anti-capitalism from a practical movement envisaged by Marx into a form of pure utopian imagination.Marcuse's interpretation of Marx's theory of alienated labor undoubtedly seriously distorts Marx's original intent,but his continuous reflection on Marx's concept of labor is a theoretical effect of Marx's philosophy under contemporary capitalist conditions.In today's relatively quiet domestic philosophical re-search on Marx's theory of alienated labor,responding to and refuting Marcuse's interpretation is necessary,as it will help us uphold the Marxist standpoint and understand Marx's philosophy as a consistent organic whole.

MarcuseAlienated LaborCultural Imagination

刘雄伟

展开 >

吉林大学哲学基础理论研究中心暨哲学社会学院(吉林长春130012)

马尔库塞 异化劳动 文化想象

中央高校基本科研业务费专项吉林大学项目

2020QY02

2024

南开学报(哲学社会科学版)
南开大学

南开学报(哲学社会科学版)

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:0.849
ISSN:1001-4667
年,卷(期):2024.(2)
  • 25