"史实"的考证与呈现——评赵盼超著作《民国初期(1912-1928)北京地区中国画研究》
Research and Presentation of"Historical Facts"——the review of Research on the Chinese Painting in Beijing during the Early Period of the Republic of China(1912-1928)by Zhao Panchao
尹丹1
作者信息
摘要
民国初期(1912-1928)即"北洋时代"北京地区的美术史研究,以往未得到学界足够的重视,近些年来成了一个热点并诞生了很多新的成果,赵盼超新著《民国初期(1912-1928)北京地区中国画研究》即是其中之一.笔者认为,该著作有三个特点,首先是该书结构及行文清晰,以史料的客观性为基础展开论述,同时注重问题意识;其次是注重以"社会身份"的视角来对所论及人物进行讨论,将"人"放到政府、社团、学院等社会网络中来进行考察;再次是注重将艺术创作放到艺术传播的视角来进行考察.这部专著在具体的研究中将更多的重心倾注于影响制约艺术创作与艺术观念的诸多社会因素,从而提供给读者一个更为完整的艺术场域,以便更为全面地了解这一时期北京的美术状况.
Abstract
The research of art history in Beijing area in the early period of the Republic of China(1912-1928),which also known as the"Beiyang era",has not received enough attention in the academic world.In recent years,it has become a hot topic and many new academic publications have appeared from this field.Zhao Panchao's new book"Research on the Chinese Painting in Beijing during the Early Period of the Republic of China(1912-1928)"is one of them.This book has three characteristics.First,the structure and writing of it are clear,and the discussion is based on the objectivity of historical materials.Secondly,this book focus on painters through the"social identity"perspective,a perspective that putting the"people"in the social networks,including the government,associations,colleges and so on;The third is that this book also pay attention to artistic creation in the perspective of art communication.In the specific research,this book focuses more on the many social factors that affect and restrict artistic creation and artistic thoughts.Thus,it provides readers with a complete art field,have a more comprehensive understanding of the art situation in Beijing during this period.
关键词
民国初期/北京/中国画/书评Key words
Early Period of the Republic of China/Beijing/Chinese painting/Book review引用本文复制引用
基金项目
重庆市研究生导师团队建设项目(2023)()
中央民族大学研究生课程建设和教育教学改革项目(2023)(GRSCP202349)
北京市高精尖学科一般项目(2020)(ART2020Y09)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据