基于层次分析-模糊综合评价法的农村生活垃圾源头分类减量与资源化利用模式评价
Evaluation of classification,reduction and resource utilization model of rural domestic waste based on AHP-FCE comprehensive evaluation method
陈雪 1罗良国 1朱洁 1耿兵1
作者信息
- 1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所,北京 100081
- 折叠
摘要
针对我国农村生活垃圾源头分类减量和资源化利用模式评价方法欠缺的问题,构建了包含1个目标层、5个准则层、10个次准则层和29个指标层的4级评价指标体系,并应用层次分析-模糊综合评价模型对8个源头分类减量和资源化利用典型案例进行定性和定量综合评价.评价结果表明,浙江省嘉兴市南湖区"垃非"全流程数字化监管模式、北京市怀柔区北沟村村民自主供给模式、江苏省泰州市政企合作治理模式和浙江省金华市"两次四分、阳光堆肥、数字监管"模式的适用性相对较好.基于评价结果分析了政府主导、村民自治、政企合作及多元共治4种模式的区域适用性.
Abstract
In order to address the lack of evaluation methods for source classification reduction and resource utilization mode of rural domestic waste in China,a comprehensive 4-level evaluation index system was developed.This system includes 1 target layer,5 criterion layers,10 sub-criterion layers,and 29 index layers.The analytic hierarchy process-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model was employed to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate eight typical cases of source classification reduction and resource utilization.The results indicated that the whole-process digital supervision model known as"Lafei"in Nanhu District of Jiaxing City,Zhejiang Province;the independent supply model implemented in Beigou Village located in Huairou District of Beijing City;the government-enterprise cooperation governance model adopted by Taizhou City in Jiangsu Province;as well as the"two-four type methods,sunshine composting,digital supervision"model practiced in Jinhua City,Zhejiang Province were relatively suitable approaches.Based on these findings,this paper further analyzed the regional applicability of four models:government-led approach,villager self-governance approach,government-enterprise cooperation approach,and pluralistic co-governance approach.
关键词
农村生活垃圾/源头分类/资源化利用/模式评价/层次分析法/模糊综合评价法Key words
rural domestic waste/source classification/resource utilization/model evaluation/analytic hierarchy process/fuzzy comprehensive evaluation引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
国家科技期刊平台
NSTL
万方数据