首页|左侧乳腺癌保留乳房手术后不同腋窝勾画方法的剂量学特点

左侧乳腺癌保留乳房手术后不同腋窝勾画方法的剂量学特点

扫码查看
目的 评估左侧乳腺癌保留乳房手术后美国肿瘤放射治疗协作组(RTOG)和欧洲放射肿瘤学会(ESTRO)指南腋窝勾画方法的剂量学特点,比较其优缺点,为临床提供参考.方法 选取2020-09-01-2021-10-31首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院放疗科收治的16例左侧乳腺癌保留乳房手术后患者,根据ESTRO和RTOG指南分别勾画腋窝淋巴引流区和全乳.ESTRO指南腋窝2组和胸肌间淋巴引流区合并勾画,并命名为腋窝Ⅱ组,腋窝3组命名为腋窝Ⅲ组,第4组淋巴结命名为锁骨上区,分别设计PTV-E(ESTRO指南)和PTV-R(RTOG指南)计划,处方剂量为50 Gy/25 f,记录各计划相关剂量学参数.应用SPSS 23.0软件,两组间比较采用配对t检验.结果 ESTRO和RTOG指南的腋窝Ⅱ组体积分别为(46.0±11.1)cm3 和(16.6±4.7)cm3(t=12.461,P<0.001),左锁骨上体积分别为(11.5±2.6)cm3 和(29.1 ±7.4)cm3,t=-9.465,P<0.001.PTV-E 计划的患侧肺 Dmean、V5、V20 和 V3.分别为(8.9±0.9)Gy、(40.2±3.2)%、(13.9±2.5)%和(8.7±2.0)%,PTV-R 计划分别为(8.2±1.0)Gy、(37.6±4.1)%、(12.1±2.4)%和(7.6±2.0)%,均P<0.05;PTV-E 和 PTV-R 计划甲状腺平均剂量分别为(11.4±7.4)Gy 和(27.3±4.2)Gy,t=-7.392,P<0.001;臂丛神经最大剂量分别为(54.4±0.7)Gy 和(54.3±1.0)Gy(t=0.122,P=0.904),V30分别为(32.1±11.1)%和(73.5± 13.2)%(t=-7.964,P<0.001),V50 分别为(20.7±8.9)%和(31.0±17.8)%,t=-2.284,P=0.037.结论 两种指南勾画方法危及器官受照剂量均满足临床需要,ESTRO指南勾画的锁骨上淋巴引流区更小,临近的甲状腺及臂丛神经受照剂量更低.
Dosimetric analysis of two contour guidelines for left breast cancer after breast conserving surgery
Objective To evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of two contour guidelines by RTOG and ESTRO for left breast cancer after breast conserving surgery.Methods From September 1,2020 to October 31,2021,16 consecutive left breast cancer after breast conserving surgery were enrolled.According to the ESTRO and RTOG guidelines,the regional lymph node areas and whole breast were delineated.For comparison,in the ESTRO guideline,axilla level 2 and interpec-toral nodes were delineated together,and named as axilla level Ⅱ,axilla level 3 named as axilla level Ⅲ,and lymph node level 4 named as supraclavicular.Each patient designed two volume modulated arc therapy plannings:PTV-E(ESTRO guideline)and PTV-R(RTOG guideline).The prescription dose was 50 Gy per 25 fractions,and the relevant dosimetric parameters of each plan were recorded.SPSS 23.0 software was used for statistical analysis.The two groups were com-pared by paired t-test.Results The volume of axilla level Ⅱ according to ESTRO and RTOG guidelines were(46.0± 11.1)cm3 and(16.6±4.7)cm3(t=12.461,P<0.001).The volume of supraclavicular according to ESTRO and RTOG guidelines were(11.5±2.6)cm3 and(29.1±7.4)cm3(t=-9.465,P<0.001).The mean dose,V5,V20,V30 to ipsi-lateral lung in the PTV-E plan were(8.9±0.9)Gy,(40.2±3.2)%,(13.9±2.5)%and(8.7±2.0)%,respectively,compared to(8.2±1.0)Gy,(37.6±4.1)%,(12.1±2.4)%and(7.6±2.0)%in the PTV-R plan(all P<0.05).The mean doses of thyroid in the PTV-E and PTV-R plans were(11.4±7.4)Gy and(27.3±4.2)Gy,respectively(t=-7.392,P<0.001).The maximum doses to the brachial plexus nerve in the PTV-E and PTV-R plans were(54.4± 0.7)Gy and(54.3±1.0)Gy,respectively(t=0.122,P=0.904),V30 were(32.1±11.1)%and(73.5±13.2)%,re-spectively(t=-7.964,P<0.001),and V50 were(20.7±8.9)%and(31.0±17.8)%,respectively(t=-2.284,P=0.037).Conclusion The exposure doses of organ at risk for both contour guidelines meet clinical needs.The volume of supraclavicular nodes according to the ESTRO guideline is smaller,and the doses of thyroid and brachial plexus nerve are lower than RTOG guideline.

breast neoplasms/radiotherapyaxillary lymph nodes/radiotherapytarget delineationguidelinedosimetry

倪文婕、王秀楠、葛永青、刘骁蕾、穆晓峰

展开 >

首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院放疗科,北京 100038

乳腺肿瘤/放射疗法 腋窝淋巴结/放射疗法 靶区勾画 指南 剂量学

首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院院青年基金

2020-q12

2024

中华肿瘤防治杂志
中华预防医学会 山东省肿瘤防治研究院

中华肿瘤防治杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.292
ISSN:1673-5269
年,卷(期):2024.31(9)
  • 27