首页|EORTC QLQ-C30汇总评分对中国结直肠癌患者预后预测价值

EORTC QLQ-C30汇总评分对中国结直肠癌患者预后预测价值

扫码查看
目的 探讨欧洲癌症研究治疗组织(EORTC)研制的生命质量量表体系(QLQ)问卷EORTC QLQ-C30汇总评分与整体生活质量(QL)维度分数的预后价值,以及汇总评分的最佳截断值.方法 采用方便抽样法选取2016-06-01-2017-08-31新疆医科大学第三附属医院住院治疗的295例结直肠癌患者临床资料,采用中文EORTC QLQ-C30量表(第3版)对患者健康相关生活质量进行问卷调查,并对其进行随访.将患者的汇总评分及QL维度得分以每10分为截断转化为十分类变量代入1、3和5年的单因素及多因素Cox风险回归,对2个分数的预测效能进行比较.通过将汇总评分根据不同截断值转化为二分类变量代入结直肠癌患者1、3和5年单因素Cox回归中,比较不同截断值划分时汇总评分的预测效能,确定其在预后分析中的最佳截断值.Kaplan-Meier法比较根据最佳截断值划分的高生活质量组与低生活质量组间生存情况差异.结果 在1、3和5年生存期内死亡病例的汇总评分低于非死亡病例(P<0.05),且在1、3和5年的单因素Cox回归分析中受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)汇总评分(AUC1年=0.692,AUC3年=0.670,AUC5年=0.670)相较于QL维度(AUC1年=0.458,AUC3年=0.587,AUC5年=0.587)展现了更好的预测效能.QL维度得分在结直肠癌患者1年生存期内非死亡患者与死亡患者分数的差异性分析,以及患者预后的单因素和多因素Cox回归分析中差异均无统计学意义,均P>0.05.通过比较不同截断值时二分类汇总评分的预测效能,得到75分为汇总评分在结直肠癌患者预后分析中的最佳截断值,Kaplan-Meier生存曲线及1、3和5年单因素Cox分析结果显示,以该截断值划分的二分类变量(AUC1年=0.623,AUC3年=0.711,AUC5年=0.710)预后价值优于直接带入的十分制的十分类变量.结论 EORTC QLQ-C30汇总评分在中国结直肠癌患者生活质量与生存预后的相关研究中展现出良好的适用性.EORTC QLQ-C30汇总评分相较于由2个条目组成的QL维度得分,更适用于作为概括生活质量的变量代入结直肠癌患者的预后分析.
Prognostic predictive value of the EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score for Chinese colorectal cancer patients
Objective To explore the prognostic value of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer(EORTC)Quality of Life Questionnaire(QLQ)EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score and the overall quality of life(QL)di-mension scores,as well as to determine the optimal cutoff value for the summary score.Methods The clinical data of 295 colorectal cancer patients hospitalized at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from June 1,2016 to August 31,2017 were collected by convenient sampling method.The Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 question-naire(version 3)was used to conduct a survey on the health-related quality of life of the patients,and follow-up was per-formed.The summary scores and QL dimension scores of the patients were converted into 10-point ordinal variables,and were entered into the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for 1-year,3-year and 5-year prognosis,to compare the predictive efficacy of the two scores.The summary scores were then converted into binary variables using different cutoff values,and entered into the univariate Cox regression for 1-year,3-year and 5-year prognosis of colorectal cancer patients to determine the optimal cutoff value for the summary score in prognostic analysis.The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival differences between the high and low quality of life groups divided by the optimal cutoff val-ue.Results The summary scores for the deceased cases within 1,3,and 5 years were lower than those for the surviving cases(P<0.05).In the univariate Cox regression analysis for 1,3,and 5 years,the summary score(AUC1 year=0.692,AUC3 year=0.670,AUC5 year=0.670)demonstrated better predictive efficiency compared to the QL dimension(AUC1 year=0.458,AUC3 year=0.587,AUC5 year=0.587).The QL dimension score showed no significant difference in the analysis of the score differences between surviving and deceased colorectal cancer patients within 1 year or in the univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for prognosis,with all P values>0.05.Comparing the predictive efficacy of the bi-nary summary score at different cutoff values identified 75 as the optimal cutoff value for the summary score in the prog-nostic analysis of colorectal cancer patients.Kaplan-Meier survival curves and univariate Cox analysis results for 1,3,and 5 years indicated that the prognostic value of the binary variable divided by this cutoff value(AUC1 year=0.623,AUC3 year=0.711,AUC5 year=0.710)was superior to the decile categorical variable directly inserted.Conclusions The EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score demonstrates good applicability in the study of the correlation between quality of life and survival prognosis in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.Moreover,the EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score is more suitable than the QL dimension score,which comprises only two items,for summarizing the patients'quality of life in the prognosis analysis of colorectal cancer patients.

colorectal cancerhealth-related quality of lifeEORTC QLQ-C30prognosissummary scores

黄子寅、凯比努尔·艾尔肯、培尔顿·米吉提

展开 >

新疆医科大学公共卫生学院,新疆乌鲁木齐 830011

新疆医科大学第三附属医院妇科放疗科二病区,新疆乌鲁木齐 830011

结直肠癌 健康相关生活质量 欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生命质量量表 预后 汇总评分

省部共建国家重点实验室流行病与卫生统计学专项目

SKL-HIDCA-2020-ER6

2024

中华肿瘤防治杂志
中华预防医学会 山东省肿瘤防治研究院

中华肿瘤防治杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.292
ISSN:1673-5269
年,卷(期):2024.31(10)
  • 3