首页|放化疗联合ICIs与单独放化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效和安全性的meta分析

放化疗联合ICIs与单独放化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效和安全性的meta分析

扫码查看
目的 比较放化疗联合免疫检点抑制剂(ICIs)与单独放化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效和安全性,为晚期NSCLC治疗提供合适的治疗方案.方法 检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库自建库至2023年5月27日的相关文献,检索关键词为 chemoradiotherapy、immune checkpoint inhibitors、carcinoma、non-small-cell lung cancer.纳入标准:比较放化疗联合ICIs和单独放化疗的疗效和安全性;研究结局指标包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、1年总生存率、1年无进展生存率、不良反应发生率;语种限制英文.排除标准:单臂试验;病例报告、尸体或动物实验、文献综述、新闻、评论、书信;资料不全、重复报道的临床数据集.结果 共纳入了 23项研究,在疗效分析中,相比单独放化疗,放化疗联合 ICIs 治疗改善了患者 OS(HR=0.57,95%CI:0.52~0.62,P<0.001)和 PFS(HR=0.58,95%CI:0.53~0.62,P<0.001),延长了一年总生存率(OR=1.98,95%CI:1.68~2.34,P<0.001)和无进展生存率(OR=1.85,95%CI:1.62~2.12,P<0.001).在安全性分析中,相比单独放化疗,放化疗联合ICIs组任何级别不良事件(OR=1.93,95%CI:1.34~2.78,P<0.001)、任何级别肺炎(OR=1.64,95%CI:1.24~2.16,P<0.001)、发热(OR=1.96,95%CI:1.18~3.24,P=0.001)、皮疹(OR=1.10,95%CI:0.73~1.67,P=0.009)、瘙痒(OR=3.51,95%CI:1.86~6.62,P<0.001)、甲状腺功能障碍(OR=8.15,95%CI:3.24~20.48,P<0.001)发生率更高.结论 对于晚期NSCLC患者,放化疗联合ICIs的疗效优于单独放化疗,但增加了呼吸、皮肤、内分泌系统的不良反应事件发生率.
Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors versus chemoradiotherapy alone in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy combined with immunodetection inhibitors(ICIs)and chemoradiotherapy alone in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC),and to provide a suitable treatment plan for advanced NSCLC.Methods Retrieve relevant literature from the establishment of PubMed,Embase,and Cochrane databases to May 27,2023 was retrieved,using the keywords chemotherapy immune checkpoint in-hibitors,carcinoma,non-small-cell lung cancer.Inclusion criteria:Comparing the efficacy and safety of radiotherapy and chemotherapy combined with ICIs and chemoradiotherapy alone;The outcome measures of the study include overall sur-vival(OS),progression free survival(PFS),1-year overall survival,1-year progression free survival,and incidence of ad-verse reactions;Language restrictions on English.Exclusion criteria:Single arm test;Case reports,cadaveric or animal ex-periments,literature reviews,news,comments,letters;Clinical datasets with incomplete information and repeated reports.Results A total of 23 studies were included.In the efficacy analysis,compared with chemoradiotherapy alone,chemoradio-therapy combined with ICIs improved OS(HR=0.57,95%CI:0.52-0.62,P<0.001),PFS(HR=0.58,95%CI:0.53-0.62,P<0.001),1-year OS rate(OR=1.98,95%CI:1.68-2.34,P<0.001)and PFS rate(OR=1.85,95%CI:1.62-2.12,P<0.001).In the safety analysis,the incidence of adverse events of any grade(OR=1.93,95%CI:1.34-2.78,P<0.001),pneumonia of any grade(OR=1.64,95%CI:1.24-2.16,P<0.001),fever of any grade(OR=1.96,95%CI:1.18-3.24,P=0.001),rash(OR=1.10,95%CI:0.73-1.67,P=0.009),pruritus(OR=3.51,95%CI:1.86-6.62,P<0.001),thyroid dysfunction(OR=8.15,95%CI:3.24-20.48,P<0.001)were higher in the chemoradiothera-py combined with ICIs group than those in chemoradiotherapy alone.Conclusion For patients with advanced NSCLC,che-moradiotherapy combined with ICIs is more effective than chemoradiotherapy alone,but it increases the incidence of ad-verse events in respiratory,skin and endocrine systems.

advanced non-small cell lung cancerradiochemotherapyimmune checkpoint inhibitorsincidence of adverse re-action eventstotal survival timeprogression free survival

朱琳、高蓉、丁东延、栾如梅、杨俊玲

展开 >

吉林大学第二医院呼吸内科,吉林长春 130022

晚期非小细胞肺癌 放化疗 免疫检查点抑制剂 不良反应事件发生率 总生存期 无进展生存期

国家重点研发计划

2021YFC2500700

2024

中华肿瘤防治杂志
中华预防医学会 山东省肿瘤防治研究院

中华肿瘤防治杂志

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.292
ISSN:1673-5269
年,卷(期):2024.31(14)